LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

NIMBYism wasn’t issue, the environment was 

Credit:  Letter: NIMBYism wasn't issue, the environment was | The Berkshire Eagle | April 23, 2017 | www.berkshireeagle.com ~~

In reference to your editorial of April 19, the wind turbine project proposed by the town of Lenox was rejected for these reasons:

1. A study showed the cost was too high, the return on investment was too low.

2. The site was not in anyone’s back yard, but in the watershed of the town’s reservoir. And it abutted the Audubon Sanctuary.

3. A study by a competent professional strongly suggested that blasting the rocky top of the ridge for the foundations of the huge towers, whether one or two or three, would damage the hydrology of the watershed in ways that could not be remediated.

4. In the unlikely but possible event that one of the turbines were to malfunction, hydraulic oil and lubricating fluids would be sprayed over a wide area and end up in the drinking water.

5. The access road would disturb more of the land than the foundations for the towers. Runoff from the maintenance road would further pollute the watershed.

6. And finally, existing restrictions on the watershed could be set aside only by an act of the Legislature, which was unlikely to happen.

The Eagle editorial’s implication that NIMBYism must not stand in the way of saving the planet is as irrational as it is unfounded. The hard-working politicians and administrators in the East have neither wind nor ridges in their backyards, so they pontificate to us out here in the Berkshires that we must (must!) accept wind turbines on every ridge if they say so. Or else.

No thanks, that’s not my idea of a free country.

Jonas Dovydenas,

Lenox

Source:  Letter: NIMBYism wasn't issue, the environment was | The Berkshire Eagle | April 23, 2017 | www.berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky