LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lobbyist spending heats up heading into session 

The single largest gift during the period was the $9,927 spent by a lobbyist from NextEra Energy Operating Services. The renewable energy company, which owns five wind farms in Oklahoma, paid for a House GOP caucus event on Dec. 4, according to the filings. The lobbying comes as Oklahoma’s wind-power tax credit, which costs the state more than $100 million a year, is being considered for curtailment in the wake of a review by the state’s Incentive Evaluation Commission. (Contrast NextEra’s gift with the largest one in the same period of 2016: The state-created Grand River Dam Authority spent $8,250 on an event to which all lawmakers were invited.)

Credit:  By Trevor Brown | Oklahoma Watch | January 13, 2017 | oklahomawatch.org ~~

Perhaps concerned about possible cuts in tate programs and business incentives, lobbyists again have spent more on gifts for legislators and state officials in the months heading into the legislative session.

Lawmakers, elected officials and other state employees received about $60,350 in gifts from special-interest groups during the last six months of 2016, according to recently filed lobbying reports.

The six-month total is slightly more than the $59,545 spent on lobbying during the same period in 2015. Both totals contrast dramatically with those in the latter halves of 2014, when $28,500 was spent, and 2013, when $19,610 was spent.

In both 2015 and 2016, the state closed out the year knowing it would have to grapple with a dramatic budget shortfall in the legislative session. (This year’s session opens on Feb. 6.)

Lobbyists tend to spend more money from February to May, when the Legislature is in session. But spending trends in months before the session can reflect more intensity to preserve or gain funding or other advantages. Special-interest groups now have their eye on a nearly $900 million budget short fall for fiscal 2018, which could lead to cuts in programs and business incentives.

About $35,000 of the $60,350 spent during the second half of 2016 came during the last two months of the year – more than in 2015. About $20,618 of that amount went toward caucus events held by Republican and Democratic lawmakers in December.

The single largest gift during the period was the $9,927 spent by a lobbyist from NextEra Energy Operating Services. The renewable energy company, which owns five wind farms in Oklahoma, paid for a House GOP caucus event on Dec. 4, according to the filings.

The lobbying comes as Oklahoma’s wind-power tax credit, which costs the state more than $100 million a year, is being considered for curtailment in the wake of a review by the state’s Incentive Evaluation Commission. (Contrast NextEra’s gift with the largest one in the same period of 2016: The state-created Grand River Dam Authority spent $8,250 on an event to which all lawmakers were invited.)

Other large spending from lobbyists during the second half of 2016 include:
* $2,075 from a lobbyist with the Chickasaw Nation for a House GOP caucus event.
* $1,525 from a lobbyist with the Association of Professional Oklahoma Educators for a GOP House caucus event.
* $1,512 from a lobbyist with the Oklahoma Rural Telephone Coalition and several telephone companies for breakfast during the House GOP’s retreat.
* $1,512 from a lobbyist with the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association and several telephone companies for breakfast during the House GOP’s retreat.
* $1,184 from a lobbyist with Cox Communications for lawmakers attending the National Conference of State Legislature’s annual conference.
* $1,000 from a lobbyist with the Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce to sponsor breakfast during a House GOP golf tournament.

Lobbyists also spent thousands of dollars on gifts for individual lawmakers and state officials; those included meals, University of Oklahoma football tickets and Oklahoma City Thunder tickets.

Several lawmakers in leadership positions were the top recipients of the lobbying during the second half of 2016:

– Senate Majority Floor Leader Sen. Greg Treat, R-Oklahoma City, received $1,393 worth of gifts from 42 sources.
– House Majority Floor Leader Rep. John Echols, R-Oklahoma City, received $1,292 worth of gifts from 29 sources.
– Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Sen. Kim David, R-Porter, received $1,055 worth of gifts from 23 sources.
– House Appropriations and Budget Committee Chairwoman Rep. Leslie Osborn, R-Mustang, received $1,039 worth of gifts from 21 sources.
– Rep. Jason Dunnington, D-Oklahoma City, received $709 worth of gifts from 12 sources.
– Speaker of the House Charles McCall, R-Atoka, received $699 worth of gifts from 14 sources.
– House Assistant Floor Leader Rep. Chris Kannady, R-Oklahoma City, received $625 worth of gifts from 20 sources.
– Rep. Tom Newell, R-Seminole, who resigned in December, received $617 worth of gifts from 12 sources.

Among other state officials, Gov. Mary Fallin received the most lobbying attention, with $475 worth of gifts from three lobbyists.

Oklahoma Ethics Commission rules allow each lobbyist to give up to $500 worth of gifts per lawmaker or state official.

Rep. Jason Murphey, R-Guthrie, has introduced a bill that would prevent lobbyists from spending more than one cent on any recipient. Murphy is one of a handful of legislators who refuse to accept gifts from lobbyists.

Source:  By Trevor Brown | Oklahoma Watch | January 13, 2017 | oklahomawatch.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky