LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Full impacts of wind project must be studied 

Credit:  Daily Advance | January 5, 2016 | www.dailyadvance.com ~~

Whoa! In your Christmas Eve’s edition there was an article about a Chowan couple’s petition to revoke Apex Clean Energy’s conditional use permit for the proposed Timbermill wind turbine project in Chowan County. It looks like the petition has merit.

The article states that there were reports of environmental studies by Apex that were not submitted to Chowan County officials as part of the application for the conditional use permit. It states the reports were presented to officials with the N.C. Division of Coastal Management that included a bird and bat study and other studies related to wildlife and human health. Was one of the other studies the monitoring of the channel catfish in the Chowan River? Will the catfish play the role of the canary in the coal mines? Will the pouring of concrete into the water table cause it to rise?

There are too many unanswered questions for a project of this magnitude to go forward. What’s needed is a pause so there can be a thorough investigation of the project’s impacts on property values, the Chowan River Fishery and the public’s drinking water.

The newspaper quotes the attorney providing legal services to Chowan County officials as saying that in addition to the county permitting process for the wind project “there are multiple layers of protection by multiple agencies.” The protection the attorney was referring to apparently includes that offered by the Department of Environmental Quality. He noted that the kind of review offered by DEQ was beyond the county’s resources and expertise.

But guess what? That does not relieve commissioners of their duty to protect the public’s health and the local economy. Not providing the information for a complete application borders on negligence if there end up being damages from a successful lawsuit.

Ed Askew

Elizabeth City

Source:  Daily Advance | January 5, 2016 | www.dailyadvance.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky