| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Turbine-tossed township still fighting
Credit: Dutton-Dunwich: The Elgin County community refuses to accept a planned wind farm, after locals voted overwhelmingly against one | By John Miner, The London Free Press | Wednesday, November 9, 2016 | www.lfpress.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Opponents of a planned Dutton-Dunwich County wind farm are taking another stab at trying to stop the project.
Bonnie Rowe of Dutton Dunwich Opponents of Wind Turbines said more than 20 volunteers are fanning out across the Elgin County municipality collecting signatures on a petition.
“We thought we would give our community an opportunity to state their wishes again,” Rowe said Wednesday. “It is quite clear to us a large majority of people we are visiting are still very opposed to wind turbines.”
The petition calls on the Ontario government to cancel the wind farm.
“We do know that if we don’t do anything, they will definitely be coming. I’m not saying it will be easy, but I still think they can be convinced it isn’t a good decision to carry on with,” Rowe said.
Ontario awarded a contract in March to Chicago-based Invenergy to build the Strong Breeze wind farm despite a referendum showing 84 per cent of residents who voted opposed the development.
In September, the Liberal government announced it was halting a new round of wind energy contracts, saying the province has enough surplus generation capacity to meet its needs for the next decade.
Rowe said that gave her group hope that Strong Breeze also could be stopped.
“The addition of more energy will just add more unnecessary cost to our already skyrocketing electricity bills,” Rowe said.
Invenergy has teamed with a NCC Development LP, a company representing six remote First Nations in northwestern Ontario, for the $150-million Strong Breeze project. They plan to build 20 to 25 industrial wind turbines. The company has said it expects to start construction in 2018.
Rowe said her group recognizes the company will have incurred costs and probably will have to be compensated. That compensation, however, will be considerably less than the cost of the contract over the next 20 years.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=80197 ]
