LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Grafton study committee: wind farm economic package benefits wealthy 

Credit:  By Michael Bielawski | November 2, 2016 | watchdog.org ~~

An economic committee in Grafton has analyzed supposed benefits of the Stiles Brook Wind Project and concluded that many residents will see no tax benefits, but ones that do typically have properties assessed at $300,000 or above.

“Over 66% of any tax relief will be attributable to properties assessed at $300,000 or above, based upon the current Grafton Grand List, although these properties make up only 33% of total properties,” the report states.

The four-member committee, made up of John Turner, Bob Donald, Hardy Merrill and Pieter van der Made, was tasked with examining the 24-turbine wind energy project’s potential impact on municipal property taxes, property values, jobs, and related economic impacts.

Committee members found that certain combinations of household income and property values “will see no tax benefit because of the tax adjustments (rebates).” The group also concluded that the $428 direct payments promised to voters will be taxed, making the number lower than advertised.

Avangrid Renewables LLC – better known as Iberdrola – is offering more than $14 million to Grafton and neighboring Windham. Payments would be paid out over 25 years to full-time residents of the two communities, which are set to vote on the wind project Nov. 8.

This committee examined the tax impact for homeowners based on their home values combined with various income levels. For example, for homeowners of a home valued at $200,000, families making between $50,000 to $110,000 get a savings of $288.56 per month. However, homeowners with homes valued at $200,000 while making only $47,000 will reap a savings of $112.66, and those making $40,000 or less will see no economic benefit.

The pattern is the same for other home values. For a $150,000 home, those with incomes of over $40,000 a year will see a savings of around $200 annually; anyone making around $30,000 or less reap no benefit.

According to the report, those who file successfully with the state for a homestead declaration – which makes property tax breaks from the state available based on income – are not eligible for money from Avangrid.

The committee worked on the report for more than 10 weeks, with input from Avangrid representatives, state Tax Department officials, and representatives from other communities with existing industrial wind projects.

The calculations to measure the economic impact for home owners were based on a 0.6354 municipal tax rate and an education tax rate of 1.2081.

The study also gave insight into the potential employment boost from the project as well as potential impact on property values. Regarding the job opportunities, it doesn’t look promising.

“Conversations with other towns that have experienced industrial wind construction have not noted any significant impact on local employment opportunities from such projects,” the report states.

The committee could not quantify the potential impacts on Windham’s tourism industry, but nevertheless found that the project “would not result in a positive economic impact for our community.”

Regarding the turbines’ impact on property values, while members said studies “were not consistent,” they did see impact for homes existing nearest to turbines.

For instance, one study by the School of Business at Clarkson University examined distance of homes from turbines and concluded that “nearby wind facilities significantly reduce property values.”

Another study, conducted by TPW Real Estate agent and town lister Allison Cummings found the volume of sales for Windham and Grafton sharply dropped off since the turbines have been announced. That study, which examined residential home sales for Jamaica, Londonderry, Townshend, Windham and Grafton for 2011-2016, notes that towns farther away from the proposed wind farm saw little or no change.

The report also notes that Avangrid has no credit rating, “which means that the security of future Iberdrola payments cannot be established.” Avangrid was contacted on this matter and has yet to respond.

Source:  By Michael Bielawski | November 2, 2016 | watchdog.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky