LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windfarm hopes to move forward 

The company behind plans to build a wind farm off the north Norfolk coast says it hopes to have all the permissions it needs in place by the end of the year.

But Scira Offshore Energy’s plan to put around 88 turbines at Shreingham Shoal is still meeting opposition from locals.

The company is currently waiting for permission from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, formerly the Department for Trade and Industry, to site the turbines, which will be in a diamond shape just over 10 miles offshore.

It has also lodged planning applications with North Norfolk District Council for the onshore grid connection route and with Broadland District Council for a substation at Salle.

Sue Vincent, communications manager for Scira, said: “Since May 2006 we have been working with the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform to alleviate any issues. We have done everything we can and we are now waiting for permission.

“We have also submitted applications to North Norfolk District Council and Broadland District Council.

“We hope to have all approvals by the end of the year. We will then start looking at the detailed design and we hope onshore construction can being in 2009 with offshore construction starting in 2010 or 2011.”

But the onshore grid connection plan is meeting with objections.

At a recent meeting of Plumstead Parish Council councillors said that they were pleased to see that at cross-country route for the onshore cable had been adopted but objected to the actual route, which goes through Plumstead.

They said they want to see an all cross country route that avoids all residential areas, takes into account areas of outstanding natural beauty and other environmental considerations.

By Dominic Chessum

Eastern Daily Press

21 October 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky