LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lal Lal group challenges wind farm laws in court 

Credit:  By Sumeyya Ilanbey | Star Weekly | April 19, 2016 | www.starweekly.com.au ~~

A Lal Lal community group is taking the state government to the Supreme Court following a decision by the planning minister that could strip people’s rights to object to changes to wind farms close to their homes.

Planning Minister Richard Wynne earlier this year approved an amendment to the state planning scheme that allows the minister to “fast-track” amendments for wind farms when there is no increase in the number of turbines or a new turbine is not proposed closer to existing dwellings.

In an explanatory report, the minister concedes the effects of this amendment will mean “a person potentially affected by the amendment will not be notified of the amendment or have an opportunity to make a submission about it”.

The Lal Lal Environment Protection Association filed a writ in the Supreme Court last month.

Association president John McMahon said the group had written to Mr Wynne asking for clarification about the amendment but got no response.

Last week he said he was unable to comment further on the matter because it was before the court.

Angela Kearns, a Mt Egerton resident who lives “very close” to planned Moorabool wind-farm turbines, said she was concerned residents and businesses affected by future decisions would not have their voices or objections heard.

“This is basically giving the minister powers to allow for changes without going to a panel hearing,” Ms Kearns said. “We might not even be given an avenue for appeal.”

Ms Kearns, who is not a member of the association, said she wasn’t anti-renewable energy or pro-coal, but she was concerned about wind farms close to people’s homes.

“I have a bit of a mantra – too many turbines too close to too many homes,” she said.

“I haven’t met anyone who’s been in this situation [objecting to wind farms close to homes] who are anti-renewable.

“We just want a fair go as Australians and [to] be listened to.”

The state government was contacted for comment.

Source:  By Sumeyya Ilanbey | Star Weekly | April 19, 2016 | www.starweekly.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky