LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Preventing government overreach: Clean Line project “not a done deal” 

Credit:  Preventing Government Overreach: Clean Line Project “Not A Done Deal” | By Sen. John Boozman | Booneville Democrat | April 09, 2016 | boonevilledemocrat.com ~~

Arkansans across the state are concerned with the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) recent partnership with Clean Line Energy, a private company, to build a large power line through Arkansas and the impact it will have on their land. One Franklin County resident recently told me that his family farm is targeted to be split in half.

I’m also concerned about this blatant government overreach. The decision by DOE erodes states’ rights. Arkansas officials reviewed and rejected this project. This marks the first time Washington bureaucrats overruled a state to build this type of project.

Infrastructure is important. Our country built a reliable electric grid without putting Washington in charge of where power lines will be built. Throughout the history of electric transmission siting, transmission projects have been reviewed and approved at the state level.

While some say Washington needs control so that renewables – like wind energy – can be put on the grid, we’ve had success without the interference of bureaucrats. I support an all-of-the-above energy plan, including wind, but this new wind capacity has been and can be installed without Washington overruling states.

Fortunately, the Obama Administration’s plan for this power line still faces hurdles. This is not a done deal. DOE must be able to legally defend its decision, and there are big gaps between what the law requires and the decision it reached.

DOE is resorting to a small provision that has never been used, from a law passed more than a decade ago. This law states that it does not “affect any requirement of any Federal or State law relating to the siting of energy facilities.” In other words, even though the Obama Administration approved the project, many legal experts think that Clean Line and DOE must return to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for final approval on the project’s location. Other parts of the DOE’s decision appear to be arbitrary and unsupported by facts.

I have asked legal experts and Congressional investigators to carefully review DOE’s decision. We are studying several related documents released by DOE, including the 22-page “Record of Decision” on the environmental review, a 73-page “Summary of Findings,” and a 210-page “Participation Agreement” between DOE and Clean Line. We will also require DOE to answer a series of questions related to its decision and provide all related documents and evidence.

Last year, in an effort to clarify the law and restore rights to Arkansans, I introduced the Assuring Private Property Rights Over Vast Access to Land (APPROVAL Act). This bill would make it crystal clear that these kinds of projects must receive state approval. Congressman Steve Womack (AR-03) introduced the same bill in the House. The legislation is supported by the entire Arkansas congressional delegation.

We will continue working to stop this project, not just because it violates property rights, but also because it violates the right of all Arkansans to have their voices heard at the state and local level.

Source:  Preventing Government Overreach: Clean Line Project “Not A Done Deal” | By Sen. John Boozman | Booneville Democrat | April 09, 2016 | boonevilledemocrat.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky