LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Shipmeadow man loses wind turbine court battle 

Credit:  By staff reporter | Eastern Daily Press | 20 November 2015 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

A Shipmeadow man has failed in his legal challenge to build a wind turbine “taller than St Paul’s Cathedral” 500 metres from his home.

Benjamin Howell, who lives at Crake Hall, had asked London’s Court of Appeal to quash the decision of a government planning inspector granting permission for the turbine to be built at nearby Laurel’s Farm.

The application was originally refused by Waveney District Council in March last year and was opposed by the Broads Authority, ten town or parish councils and many residents.

However the inspector approved an appeal in 2014 by Stamford Renewable Energy Ltd, finding that while some would perceive the resulting changes to the landscape as harmful, the turbine would not prevent the public enjoyment of The Broads.

Mr Howell’s lawyers claimed that the planning inspector who gave the go-ahead made an “error of law” by misinterpreting his duty to protect the Norfolk Broads – only 750 metres away – from the impact of the turbine. They also argued the inspector hadn’t properly considered the benefits of the project or the noise it would produce.

But yesterday three of the country’s top judges rejected those arguments. Lords Justices Richard and Briggs and Sir David Keene and said that the High Court judge Mr Justice Cranston had produced a “thorough and careful judgment” rejecting the points. In the ruling under challenge, Mr Justice Cranston said that, while he was “troubled by a turbine which would be taller than St Paul’s in London”, the inspector who granted consent had been entitled reach his decision.

Source:  By staff reporter | Eastern Daily Press | 20 November 2015 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon