LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plans for a 78-metre wind turbine at Hempstead turbine refused 

Credit:  Tracey Gray | Eastern Daily Press | 23 July 2015 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

A bid to build a 78-metre high turbine situated near heritage assets and an Area of Outstanding Natural beauty have been refused by councillors.

The decisions to refuse the plans for a turbine on Selbrigg Farm, Hempstead, was made by North Norfolk District Council’s development committee yesterday .

It came after planning officers said the turbine proposals, which had received 632 objections and one letter of support, would result in significant harm to setting of number of heritage assets, including Baconsthorpe Castle, and the nearby designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Carl Gorham, who lives in Lower Bodham in one of the houses closest to where the proposed site of the turbine, said it would have a significant impact on the “peaceful haven” and “precious island of comfort” he had tried to create at his home with his daughter, after losing his wife to cancer in 2007.

He added: “It would have an effect on local people walking and biking, but also those people who enjoying holidaying here.”

The proposal was submitted by farm owner Francis Feilden, who lives on Selbrigg Farm. He said it would create enough electricity for 343 homes and would also provide revenue to aid the restoration of Selbrigg Pond, which has high environmental value.

Speaking after the meeting, Mr Feilden’s agent, John Fairlie, said: “We are very disappointed. We will read carefully the reasons for refusal and decided on the next course of action.”

Source:  Tracey Gray | Eastern Daily Press | 23 July 2015 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky