LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

‘Legal threat’ delays end to subsidies for onshore windfarms 

Credit:  By Kate Langston | Western Morning News | Posted: June 11, 2015 | www.westernmorningnews.co.uk ~~

Government plans which could have halted the spread of large onshore wind farms in the region have been delayed, as the Conservatives seek to protect themselves from possible legal challenges.

The pledge to end subsidies for onshore wind energy projects was a key commitment in the Conservative election manifesto – alongside legislation to give local authorities more say over new developments.

It was welcomed by anti-turbine campaigners in Devon and Cornwall who saw it as an opportunity to preserve local landscapes and encourage smaller and offshore farms.

But while the Government was expected to begin implementing the pledge as early as next week, it is understood to have postponed its plans in response to a perceived legal threat from the renewables industry.

Hopes were raised that ending subsidies would be a priority for ministers when David Cameron referenced the policy in the Queen’s Speech.

It was mentioned alongside a new Energy Bill, which includes measures to devolve more decision-making powers to planning authorities.

The first stage of the Conservatives’ plans involve shutting down a subsidy scheme called the Renewables Obligation a year early in 2016.

But according to the Telegraph, announcements scheduled for this week have been put back while officials work to make the scheme less “vulnerable”.

Peter Waller, of the Turbine Action Group, expressed disappointment at the delay.

“We are seeing a rush of applications already to make sure they qualify for the Feed In Tariff (FIT) and this will only be to their advantage,” he said.

“If wind energy is the answer to our energy problem then let it stand on its own, pay them for what they produce.

“Instead of ruining the Cornish countryside with these industrial units make it compulsory that every new house built has to have solar panels installed this way we would not be industrialising Cornwall.

“It really is time that Cornwall stop all commercial renewable schemes until an open and transparent debate has taken place.”

The news of the postponement comes just days after members of the renewables sector voiced their objection to subsidy proposals in an article for the Guardian.

Writing on June 1, Marcus Trinick, a member of Renwables UK, warned ministers not to “destroy” the industry by interfering with state aid.

He also cited previous Government attempts to change the rules for solar power – which he said led to a “perfect storm of legal challenges” – and urged ministers to enter into a dialogue with the industry before they act.

Merlin Hyman, chief executive of RegenSW suggested the Government’s plans penalised people who had already made investments in projects.

“That’s bad policy,” he said. “The Government has sent out some clear signals over the years encouraging the appropriate development of onshore wind. If the new Government wants to make changes to that, it needs to do so in a steady way that gives people time to adapt.

“As an industry, we are against subsidies as a long-term measure, but change needs to be implemented in the right way.”

However, despite the uncertainty, North Cornwall Conservative MP Scott Mann said he believed ministers were “fully committed” to delivering on the manifesto.

“I have made it known for some time that I am not a supporter of new large wind turbines in North Cornwall,” he said. “I have also stood shoulder to shoulder with communities who are trying to stop the negative impacts wind turbines have on the landscape.

“I believe that these are small matters that will be resolved soon enough, and the onshore subsidy will be removed in the very near future.”

Source:  By Kate Langston | Western Morning News | Posted: June 11, 2015 | www.westernmorningnews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky