LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

State lawmakers try again to set aggressive renewable energy targets 

Credit:  Tom Johnson | NJ Spotlight | May 1, 2015 | www.njspotlight.com ~~

Legislators are preparing to take another crack at dramatically ramping up how much of the state’s electricity comes from renewable energy, such as solar and wind power.

In a hearing before the Senate Environment and Energy Committee on Monday, lawmakers will consider a bill (S-2444) to require 80 percent of the electricity used by residents and businesses to come from renewable sources.

The draft, kicking around in the Legislature for months, is viewed by advocates as crucial to meeting the state’s ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions contributing to global climate change.

Critics, however, say it will only increase energy bills in a state already saddled with some of the nation’s highest costs for electricity. Because of those concerns, the bill is not likely to be passed in this session, but advocates hope to lay the groundwork to have it approved in the next few years.

Like many other states, New Jersey has adopted a so-called renewable energy portfolio, which requires electricity to be generated from cleaner sources than conventional fossil fuel power plants. By 2020, 22.5 percent of the electricity should come from renewable energy, according to the state’s Energy Master Plan.

The bill, as currently drafted, sets some high targets, particularly having 14 percent of the state’s electricity come from solar by 2030. The current rate from solar is in the low single digits.

“It is way too much,’’ said Fred DeSanti, a lobbyist who advocates for several renewable energy companies “You can’t do it.’’

Lyle Rawlings, the head of a coalition pushing for the bill, said its members were excited about the measure coming up once again before the committee, but expressed concern about unseen amendments to the legislation. “It has most of what we want,’’ said Rawlings, the head of a solar firm based in New Jersey.

To meet the bill’s aggressive solar goals, Rawlings acknowledged that New Jersey has to bring the cost of solar down. A solar installation here costs four times more than one in New York state.

The other big unresolved issue is that both the bill and the Energy Master Plan require the development of offshore wind farms along the Jersey coast. That is yet to happen, nor is it likely to happen anytime soon. The Energy Master Plan calls for building 1,100 megawatts of offshore wind by 2020. No project has yet to be approved.

Offshore wind has been delayed because of the Christie administration’s failure to adopt regulations that would provide an incentive – paid by utility customers – to help fund those projects. That inaction has drawn criticism from Democrats and clean energy advocates, all of whom have backed offshore wind.

“This bill, in practical terms, would require offshore wind,’’ Rawlings said. According to federal officials, New Jersey has what may be the best potential of states along the Eastern Seaboard to harness wind to produce electricity.

Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, said the legislation is important because when older conventional power plans are retired, they need to be replaced with electricity from renewable energy.

“Of all the 4,000 bills in the Legislature, this is the most important out there,’’ Tittel said, calling it critical to achieving the state’s greenhouse gas emissions goals.

Source:  Tom Johnson | NJ Spotlight | May 1, 2015 | www.njspotlight.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky