LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

CMP’s parent company gets $2.2 billion in federal tax credits 

Credit:  Darren Fishell, Bangor Daily News | Tuesday, March 17, 2015 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

PORTLAND – The corporate subsidy watchdog agency Good Jobs First found Central Maine Power Co. parent company Iberdrola topped the list of all recipients of federal grants and tax credits, primarily in tax credits for its renewable energy developments.

Energy companies generally topped the list of grants, as the review by Good Jobs First included tax credits wind power companies can receive for each unit of electricity they produce.

SunEdison, which purchased wind developer First Wind earlier this year, was second on the list for the same reason. Both companies are major owners of wind projects.

Dan Hucko, spokesman for Iberdrola U.S.A., told Al Jazeera America the $2.2 billion in credits have helped create jobs and wind power and natural gas infrastructure that benefit electricity customers.

The breakdown of federal subsidies comes from the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Good Jobs First, which released its database of corporate subsidies early Tuesday. The federal subsidies cover 137 programs in 11 federal Cabinet agencies from 2000 to the most recent records.

Greg LeRoy, the organization’s executive director, said in a news release that the data aimed to give transparency to which companies specifically are receiving federal assistance.

“For more than 20 years, so-called corporate welfare has been debated widely with little awareness of which companies were receiving most of the federal assistance,” LeRoy said.

In its report on the data, the group said it found the same pattern of spending: that big businesses and their subsidiaries received the bulk of $68 billion in federal grants or tax credits and about $17 trillion in loans and bailout assistance, excluding repayments, since 2000.

For bailout assistance, totals of payments were in the trillions, topped by Bank of America, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan Chase and Barclays. The report notes that the total includes a number of short-term loans, making the actual amount outstanding at one point in time hard to identify and most of those loans were repaid.

The organization also keeps state-level subsidy data, to which it added about 160,000 records of federal subsidies, including loans of $10,000 or more and grants of $1,000 or more.

At the state level, the group’s figures show last year that Verso Paper was the largest recipient of subsidies, getting tax abatements totalling $3.2 million. Tax abatements were the major source of tax breaks at the state level, with Bath Iron Works also getting about $3.2 million in abatements, Sappi Paper about $2 million, GNP West in Millinocket about $1.9 million and National Semiconductor about $1.5 million.

The group said the study does not aim to evaluate federal subsidy practices.

“We do believe, however, that the public has a right to detailed, company-specific information on the support federal agencies are providing to the private sector, and that disclosure is fundamental to reform,” the report states.

The release of the newly gathered federal data coincides with Sunshine Week, sponsored and started by media outlets seeking to explore the openness and availability of government records.

Source:  Darren Fishell, Bangor Daily News | Tuesday, March 17, 2015 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky