LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Gage, Lancaster counties merge wind efforts 

Credit:  By Scott Koperski/Daily Sun news editor | Beatrice Daily Sun | March 15, 2015 | beatricedailysun.com ~~

ROCA – Setback requirements, shadow flicker, ice thaw and health issues were all concerns raised during the first in a series of meetings concerning wind farm regulations.

Officials from Gage and Lancaster counties held their first of seven public meetings concerning wind farm regulations Thursday evening at the Roca Community Center. More than 20 members of the public joined the 20-person working group of invited officials to discuss regulations.

The meetings will largely concern setback regulations for both counties that will be umbrella policies for all future applicants, though the topic was promoted by a recent move to build a wind farm in southern Lancaster and northern Gage counties.

Volkswind USA announced plans last September for a wind farm that would be primarily in Lancaster County, though it would also occupy around 4,000 acres in Gage County.

Plans were recently halted while both counties reexamine their regulations.

The bulk of the 90-minute meeting was a presentation from Joseph Wood, Volkswind project manager. Wood discussed the process of building wind farms and issues that have arisen in the past.

Wood said the area between the two counties is a prime location due to its high wind levels and proximity to needed transition lines.

“The siting process, especially recently, it’s a very competitive process and I think early on it was kind of a no-brainer sometimes where these things should go, large tracts of wind-swept area,” Wood said. “But you need to have transmission lines. You have to have the transmission lines there to interconnect at a reasonable size to make these projects work.”

No specific changes to either county’s regulations were discussed, as the meeting served as a jumping off point for future discussions where more specific aspects will be addressed.

Volkswind was scheduled to discuss Lancaster County’s setback requirements in February, though the company withdrew its application to change the zoning code.

While past efforts have stalled, Stephen Henrichsen with the Lincoln/Lancaster County Planning Department said the group hopes to gain a fresh perspective moving forward.

“From this point forward, we really want to start with a clean slate and move forward in terms of our discussion,” he said. “We really don’t want to focus on what may or may not have happened in the last six months in terms of the process.

“We’ve decided to take timeouts on the applications that we do have on hand. We have several months here to visit, learn information and see if we can come up with some regulations that meet various interests.”

Gage County Board member Matt Bauman said Gage County’s wind turbine regulations haven’t changed since they were set in 2010.

The County Board previously discussed its own setback requirements, which state the base of a wind turbine must be at least 1,250 feet from the nearest corner of a nonparticipating residence. The board has discussed doubling the setback requirement to 2,500 feet.

Volkswind previously stated the wind farm would bring more than 200 construction jobs and about $700,000 in total tax benefits annually to both counties.

The wind farm was estimated to cost $150 million to $190 million to construct.

Source:  By Scott Koperski/Daily Sun news editor | Beatrice Daily Sun | March 15, 2015 | beatricedailysun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky