LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine plan rejected as ‘foreign structure’ in AONB 

Credit:  Market Rasen Mail | 13 March 2015 | www.marketrasenmail.co.uk ~~

Plans for two wind turbines in Brookenby have been turned down by West Lindsey District Council.

Melvyn Cross of Total Reclaims Ltd sought to erect two 60kW wind turbines with a 22m hub height and 34m tip height on the western edge of Binbrook Technical Park.

The proposal was opposed by nearby residents and parish councils who expressed concerns over noise, visual amenity, the site was too near houses and would damage bird-life.

The Ministry of Defence withdrew objections the turbines would interfere with air defence radar at Staxton Wold, but the National Air Traffic Services said they would impact on the Claxby Radar and London Area Control centre.

Natural England and East Lindsey District Council also said the turbines would spoil the landscape in a part of the wolds that is an Outstanding Area of Natural Beauty.

A council report concluded: “The proposal will introduce two large vertical and moving structures that would introduce a foreign structure into a landscape which is designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The turbines would be a constant and defining element within the nearby and surrounding landscape that would have a detrimental visual impact on the views and setting of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty from several vantage points including public rights of way.”

It also warned of risks to radar and the application had insufficient information concerning its impact on heritage assets, protected species and their habitats.

Source:  Market Rasen Mail | 13 March 2015 | www.marketrasenmail.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky