LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court: Falmouth should have obtained permit before erecting turbine 

Credit:  By Sean F. Driscoll | Cape Cod Times | Posted Feb. 26, 2015 | www.southcoasttoday.com ~~

FALMOUTH – The town of Falmouth should have obtained a special zoning permit before it put up one of its controversial wind turbines, the Massachusetts Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

The court ruled in favor of a cluster of neighbors who sued the town building commissioner and Zoning Board of Appeals over its 2009 installation of Wind 1, one of the twin wind turbines erected at the town’s wastewater treatment facility.

The Appeals Court ruled that just because the turbines are owned by the town does not mean they are exempt from the town’s bylaw that requires a special permit to construct a wind turbine.

The court stopped short, however, of ordering the town to shut down Wind 1 until a special permit is issued. The turbines are already operating on a reduced schedule under a November 2013 order from Judge Christopher Muse that curtailed their usage.

The town’s zoning bylaw exempts town buildings from the zoning permit process but it doesn’t specifically list wind turbines as an example of a town building. Although it doesn’t have to be named to be covered by that exemption, the Court of Appeals determined that the wind turbine bylaw’s existence means the devices were not intended to be an exception to the zoning process, the decision said.

Barnstable Superior Court Judge Robert Rufo had ruled otherwise in June 2013.

“Because the by-law does not contain any exemption for the town from its provisions … it is apparent that the decisions of the ZBA and the Superior Court judge, which relied on incorrect interpretations of the by-law, are not entitled to deference,” the Court of Appeals wrote.

Frank Duffy, Falmouth’s town counsel, said he had distributed the ruling to town officials and the Board of Selectmen, who will ultimately decide the town’s next move. The town could petition the Supreme Judicial Court for a review of the case.

“I will be looking for direction,” he said.

Source:  By Sean F. Driscoll | Cape Cod Times | Posted Feb. 26, 2015 | www.southcoasttoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon