LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Permitting appeals board staff recommends OK for Bingham wind power project 

Credit:  By Darren Fishell, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Posted Feb. 25, 2015 | bangordailynews.com ~~

PORTLAND, Maine – Staff of the state’s environmental permitting appeals board have recommended upholding a permit for a proposed western Maine wind farm that would be Maine’s largest wind power project to date.

The Board of Environmental Protection, an appointed citizen oversight panel, will consider the Bingham Wind permit appeal at a March 5 meeting and hear oral arguments before taking up a draft order that would uphold the permit for the 62-turbine wind farm.

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection gave a permit to the $398 million project in September. It is led by subsidiaries of the former First Wind, now part of solar energy giant SunEdison after a $2.4 billion sale that closed in January.

The anti-wind-power group Friends of Maine Mountains filed an appeal of the project permits to the BEP in October, arguing in part that the company did not have adequate financing to provide for the project’s decommissioning.

BEP staff wrote in the draft order that the company was right in its estimates of those costs and that its plan meets the requirement that project decommissioning be fully funded before construction begins.

Rand Stowell, a member of the board of directors for Friends of Maine Mountains, said in a prepared statement that he was not surprised by the decision.

“Even though it is a rare occurrence, we hope that the BEP will overturn the decision,” Stowell said. “But if they won’t overturn it, at the very least we would like to see some stricter conditions placed on the permit.”

He said the group will argue that there should be tougher requirements for decommissioning turbines.

Since the group started its appeals, the structure and finances of the company changed substantially.

Last year, the company’s joint venture with power utility Emera was in jeopardy, bouncing between state utility regulators and the Maine Supreme Judicial Court amid a challenge from the smaller utility, Houlton Water Co. Houlton Water raised concerns about the investment of the parent company of utility Emera Maine in power generation projects in the state.

Utilities were required to get rid of their generation capacity through the restructuring of Maine’s electricity markets in 2000.

As part of buying First Wind, SunEdison also bought out Emera’s stake in the joint venture, effectively putting a halt to state regulators consideration of that case.

Some of the same questions have emerged in a separate case, however, involving a wind project by a sister company of Central Maine Power Co., near Fletcher Mountain in Somerset County.

The Bingham project would have turbines located on property in Bingham, Abbot, Parkman, Mayfield Township and Kingsbury Plantation. It has reached agreements to make for 20 years annual payments of $106,900 to Bingham, $20,000 to Moscow, Abbot and Parkman, and $176,000 to Kingsbury Plantation.

Source:  By Darren Fishell, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Posted Feb. 25, 2015 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky