LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents not consulted on wind farm 

The article “Residents’ views considered in new wind farm plans” (Times & Star, September 7) is incorrect in reporting that a public meeting had been held at the request of Westnewton Parish Council and that the wind farm plans take residents’ views into consideration.

Despite earlier offers to hold a meeting in June or July, Broadview Energy have only recently proposed a date, at the end of September, for a public display about the Warwick Hall wind farm.

At their request, Broadview Energy gave a short presentation about the project at a meeting of Westnewton Parish Council on May 10. This is the only ‘public’ meeting in Westnewton that Broadview has attended.

Since the initial proposal, the scale and location of the turbines have been changed and Westnewton Parish Council is unaware of some of these facts – locations in particular.

How, therefore can residents’ views have been considered?

If the development contains five turbines of 107 metre tip height, probably similar to the two close to the chemical plant in Siddick, then given that much of the site is 35 metres above Westnewton, the perceived rotor tip height will be 142 metres (466ft) at village level.

These huge structures would be arrayed along a ridge that commands the Solway Plain west of Allonby and will be clearly visible from south west Scotland the north Lakeland fells and much of the north west Solway area.

The turbines at Bothel are visible for many miles, but are about 21 metres (69ft) shorter than those planned for Westnewton!

The general tone of the article reads like an advertisement for Broadview and asks no questions about the justification for despoiling a pretty Cumbrian village.

I am surprised that the Times & Star did not ask local residents or Westnewton Parish Council for their view.

JOHN RYDEN

Chairman,

Westnewton Parish Council

Times & Star

14 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon