LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Suffolk fishermen call for compensation after seabed cables serving Greater Gabbard wind farm leaves key area off-limits 

Credit:  Andrew Hirst | East Anglian Daily Times | Friday, February 6, 2015 | www.eadt.co.uk ~~

Suffolk fishermen say their livelihoods have been threatened by offshore wind farms after cables laid on the seabed left a key area off-limits for more than year.

Small fishing boats in Aldeburgh are said to unable to access important Dover sole stocks about two miles off the coast because of the disruption caused to the seabed.

The cables were laid to transfer power generated by the Greater Gabbard wind farm to an onshore connection with the National Grid near Sizewell.

Once the work was completed, the fishermen say developers had agreed to return the seabed to its original condition, but this, they claim, has failed to happen, posing hazards for vessels and nets.

With small-scale fishing already under pressure, the fishermen say further disruption could mean the end of their industry and are calling for developer compensation.

One, who asked to remain anonymous, said: “We can barely exist as it is and little things like this are going to push us over the edge.

“When these wind companies are making so much money the amount that we are talking about is peanuts and yet they don’t seem to want to give us anything.

“We’ve been here for generations and yet with this they seem to be pushing us out.”

Jerry Percy, a spokesman for the New Under Ten Fishermen’s Association, said the disruption had gone on for 14 months and was a major concern for the inshore fishermen whose fishing grounds have already been depleted.

“There are serious concerns about the impact that development of these sites has on fish stocks and fishermen,” he added.

“These things can take forever to rectify. There seems to be no great urgency in ensuring the fishermen receive compensation but we are currently in negotiations with the developers and hope to have a positive outcome.”

Greenpeace has also backed the fishermen, who it says have received little support from the government compared with the larger, less sustainable end of the industry.

Oceans campaigner Nina Schrank said: “These fishermen are already very marginalised and situations like these don’t help.

“It’s an important fishery and it should be returned, as promised, or compensation paid.”

A spokesman for Greater Gabbard Offshore Winds Limited (GGOWL) said the company held regular meetings with the fishing industry representatives to address concerns.

“As a responsible operator GGOWL takes our obligations to the community in which we work seriously,” the spokesman added.

The fishermen have also been critical of government agencies for failing to ensure that the seabed was returned to its original condition.

A spokesman for the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) said original permission for the wind farm was given before the MMO was created but it had regulated further works related to the development, such as the cabling.

“We’re aware of the concerns raised by the fishermen about the cable and have been in touch with the developers about these,” the spokesman added.

“A working group has been established, which includes representatives of the fishing industry and a fisheries liaison officer employed by the developer in order to keep the industry informed of all on-going works relating to the cable protection.”

Source:  Andrew Hirst | East Anglian Daily Times | Friday, February 6, 2015 | www.eadt.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon