LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Federal judge allows part of case against Kingfisher wind farm to proceed 

Credit:  By Paul Monies, Energy Reporter | The Oklahoman | January 27, 2015 | newsok.com ~~

A federal judge will let a nuisance complaint against a wind farm under construction in Kingfisher and Canadian counties go forward, although he dismissed another claim against Apex Clean Energy.

U.S. District Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti said a group of landowners failed to show the Kingfisher wind farm being built by Apex would trespass on their land. But their case can go forward on an anticipatory nuisance claim on health and safety grounds.

The lawsuit is still in its early stages, and no evidence has been presented.

DeGiusti said the Oklahoma Wind Action Association would be allowed to be part of the case if it could identify its members.

“If plaintiffs can allege facts as to OWAA’s members’ participation, control and funding, they may also be able to allege facts as to the identity of its members and whether they have standing to sue in their own right,” the judge wrote.

DeGiusti also said he would be open to additional arguments that would show others might be affected by the wind farm through a class-action status.

The plaintiffs want to include all landowners within a three-mile radius of the planned locations of the wind turbines.

The judge gave the landowners and the association three weeks to file an amended complaint that addresses his concerns.

Terra Walker, one of the seven landowners who brought the lawsuit, said she was happy with the court’s ruling.

“Our nuisance claim is upheld and we have a chance to move the case forward,” Walker said. “We’re happy they didn’t dismiss the entire case and are saying it’s not frivolous.”

Apex representatives declined to comment on DeGiusti’s order, issued Monday in federal court in Oklahoma City.

Apex said last week it had sold the 298-megawatt Kingfisher project to First Reserve Corp., a private equity and infrastructure investment firm based in Connecticut. Apex will continue to manage construction.

Source:  By Paul Monies, Energy Reporter | The Oklahoman | January 27, 2015 | newsok.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky