LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Trawden turbine plan thrown out 

Wind turbines should not be placed on Trawden’s hillsides because they will “ruin” the area for tourists, councillors said.

In a u-turn from Pendle Council’s policy to champion individual electricity generation, plans for a 15m turbine at Cemetery House, Boulsworth Hill, were rejected after senior members complained the landscape would be “destroyed.”

The proposals, which went before Pendle Council’s Colne Committee, had received mixed reactions in the village, but were supported by the parish council.

Coun Graham Roach, the council’s ‘energy champion’, said it was the authority’s responsibility to cut carbon emissions through schemes like this one, while applicant Daniel Smith said windmills were a symbol of conservation.The proposed turbine would have provided electricity for the entire farm.

But Coun Tony Greaves said no windmills or wind farms should be placed on hillsides, calling instead for off-shore and coastal turbines.

He said: “We are serious about bringing more tourists into Pendle and a lot are going to go walking in those fields and moors.

“We are going to destroy that if we allow these things scattered all over the whole landscape.

“You can say we’ll look at each one on its merits, but the fact is that sooner or later it’s going to be impossible to stop any of them because the case people will put forward is that actually there is no landscape to preserve any more and another one, or 10, or 100, won’t make any difference any more.

“From the experience we have with a single turbine at the Herders in Laneshawbridge, it’s an appalling object and it’s a disgrace that it’s been allowed in a moorland setting.

“I question whether it’s possible to make the changes needed to cope with climate change without sacrificing our beautiful and precious landscape.”

Coun Dorothy Lord added: “We should be looking to the future for energy, but saying that, would you want one in your back yard? Probably not.”

By Camilla Sutcliffe

Burnley & Pendle Citizen

10 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky