LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents angry at ‘Plan C’ 

Credit:  Montrose Review | 08 January 2015 | www.montrosereview.co.uk ~~

A proposal, revealed a year ago by Green Cat Renewables, to build a windfarm 900 metres from Rossie School, has been withdrawn.

However, although that has proved good news for opponents of the plan, they are less pleased by the follow-up, that an alternative, albeit smaller, plan has been put forward.

And the withdrawn application was a scaled down version of the 2007 bid for three turbines, each 105 metres high.

In place of the proposed three 80-metre turbines, the latest plan, in conjunction with land-owner John Stirling, is to build two 51-metre masts.

Glen Moon, of Tellus Energy, will submit renewed proposals to Angus Council in due course.

Local man Mr Gordon Paterson repeated his opposition, stating that the objections raised in connection with the previous application remain fundamentally relevant.

And despite the lowering of the proposed height, Mr Paterson remains adamant that they are too high and incompatible in an area of outstanding beauty, forever spoiling the landscape.

He was also gravely concerned about the effect the turbines would have on wildlife, both native and migrating.

There was also a previous objection from Rossie School, whose operators felt that the previous wind farm would impact on those using the moor for recreational purposes.

Historic Scotland had the opportunity to object but did not, stating its belief that the impacts on the setting of a number of heritage assets would not be of a sufficient magnitude.

Source:  Montrose Review | 08 January 2015 | www.montrosereview.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky