| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Turbines bid blown off course by stones
Credit: Berwick Advertiser | 19 December 2014 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Plans for two more wind turbines at Felkington Farm have been dismissed at appeal because of their perceived impact on the Duddo Stones.
The application for a pair of 34.5m tall masts just over one mile from the historic stones was initially rejected by Northumberland County Council last March.
An appeal was subsequently lodged by Lee Houghton of Fine Energy, the speculative developers behind the scheme.
But Richard McCoy, an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, echoed the concerns of the council’s north area planning committee.
He considered the proposal ‘would be a very detrimental intrusion’ into the relationship between the 4,000-year-old Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) and the surrounding landscape.
He added: “The proposal would cause harm to the significance of a heritage asset of considerable importance (Duddo Stones) by introducing an incongruous development within its setting.
“The proposal would not be visible in the long walk towards the SAM from the south but would be prominently in view upon reaching the SAM. The proposed turbines, although of a modest scale would nevertheless be a stand out feature when seen from the SAM. Those visiting the stones and contemplating their significance would be distracted by seeing the upper portions of the turbines, in particular their rotating blades.
“Whilst it is appreciated that there are a number of electricity poles in the vicinity and an existing turbine at Felkington Farm, these are not as tall as the proposed turbines.
“I consider that the environmental benefits accruing from a reduction in the emission of greenhouse gasses and the commitment to remove the turbine after 20 years following any grant of planning permission would not outweigh the less than substantial harm arising from the proposal.”
He also acknowledged concerns about cumulative impact should a 74m turbine at Shoreswood Farm be approved.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=68757 ]
| Tag: Victories |
