LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Gone with the wind 

In a 2-1 decision, the conditional-use permit application for the proposed wind farm was denied by the Ellis County Commission during Monday’s meeting.

Vernon Berens and Dennis Pfannenstiel voted in favor of the conditional-use permit application, while Perry Henman said the county should start the application process over and revisit zoning regulations.

“I’ve been, in the past, for it with conditions. And I’ve sort of changed my mind on that,” Henman said. “I’m pretty much thinking that we need to re-do our zoning rules and regs. They’re insufficient.”

It was standing-room only in the Ellis County commission chambers this morning. More than 40 people and local law enforcement officers were present for the long-awaited decision.

Pfannenstiel made a motion in favor of the project, which included several conditions, such as provision of a decommissioning agreement, a road-maintenance agreement and a minimum distance of 2,000 feet from existing residences.

Henman said, while this motion is a step in the right direction, the county’s zoning regulations need to be improved before such a project should be implemented.

“Here’s our rules and regulations,” Henman said, holding up the 1Ôªø1Ñ2 [sic] pages of wind farm-related zoning regulations. “Now we’re entering a resolution that’s seven pages long. I think the protest people would feel a lot better and there might be less protest if we sat down and did this right from the start.”

Chairman Berens said he agreed with Henman, to a degree.

Berens said that, while zoning regulations might need improvement, there still would be time for negotiation if the permit was granted.

“I think this motion is in the right direction. We will never have a perfect set of regulations,” Berens said. “The towers aren’t up yet. There are some things we need to enter into agreements with. It is up to us to see to it that we implement some of this into our regulations.”

In accordance with zoning regulations, a unanimous decision would have been required to approve the permit application because of a protest petition filed with the Ellis County clerk in June.

Petitions were filed for more than 40 percent of landowners in the area affected by the permit – 20 percent is needed to require a unanimous vote by county commissioners.

Project manager Krista Gordon said she was not surprised by the decision.

“We knew that was a possibility,” she said.

While she said the company has no intention of filing a lawsuit to force the issue, she said it plans to regroup and move ahead with what likely will be another proposal for the wind farm development in Ellis County.

“We have no intention of giving up,” Gordon said.

Iberdrola Renewable Energies USA will have the opportunity to reapply for the zoning permit and start the application process again. In accordance with zoning regulations, the application cannot be reconsidered for at least one year from today.

The vote was good news to some. The Ellis County Environmental Awareness Coalition, a group of residents opposing the wind project, were pleased with the outcome.

“Throughout this application process, it has become apparent that the Ellis County zoning regulations are severely lacking in content to protect the community from ill-sited developments of this kind,” the coalition said in a press release. “Furthermore, the application process itself needs to be revisited, as this development failed to follow the process appropriately.”

By Kaley Lyon

Hays Daily News

4 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky