LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind project statements contested 

Credit:  Erie Times-News | November 7, 2014 | www.goerie.com ~~

As Don Goldstein is an economics professor, I’m hoping he can provide some data to support his statement in a letter about Pioneer’s wind project (“FAA wrong on wind energy ruling,” Oct. 30).

He states that Pioneer’s wind project will generate “many high-paying jobs” during construction and in long-term operation. My research shows that many workers during the wind project construction phase, which typically lasts less than nine months, are from out of state and that wind projects hire very few long-term workers during the operational phase. It would be helpful to know the actual number of jobs proposed for this project, where the workers come from, and how much they are actually paid.

I’d also like more information on “proper siting that minimizes effects on wildlife.” What has Pioneer done to reduce potential wildlife impacts? The Lake Erie area is a hugely important migratory corridor for millions of birds. How will Pioneer’s plan reduce direct mortality to birds and bats?

Right now, across the entire PJM grid (coordinates movement of wholesale electricity in parts of several states), we receive only 0.07 percent of our electricity from what the PJM grid considers to be reliable wind power. So I’m not sure how Pioneer’s proposed project can be considered “environmentally important.”

I’ve talked to wind developers who laugh at the number of turbines in projects here in Pennsylvania, as projects here are tiny compared to ones farther to the west. I’ve been told that projects in Pennsylvania are insignificant in number of turbines, electricity output, CO2 reduction and climate change reduction.

Laura Jackson

president, Save Our Allegheny Ridges, Everett, Bedford County

Source:  Erie Times-News | November 7, 2014 | www.goerie.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon