LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windfarm consent sought 

Credit:  By Mark Mackay | The Courier | November 1, 2014 | ~~

The future of the Highland Perthshire landscape is in the hands of the Scottish Government today as it considers plans for a giant new windfarm.

The Crossburns scheme is so significant that under current legislation it bypasses consideration by Perth and Kinross Council.

Should Ministers grant the plan, 25 turbines will be erected on land 4km to the southwest of Aberfeldy and within touching distance of the existing Calliacher site.

Each turbine would rise 115m from ground to blade tip and it is anticipated that they would be in place for the next 25 years.

Despite significant local opposition, the developer – through its subsidiary Crossburns Windfarm Ltd – has decided to progress with the scheme.

West Coast Energy’s Steve Salt said: “We are pleased to have submitted our formal application seeking consent for Crossburns Wind Farm to Scottish Ministers.

“The results of the environmental impact assessment indicate that the site is an appropriate location for signif icant renewable energy generation.

“We look forward to a continued engagement with the community as the application progresses through the consenting process”.

The Crossburns scheme would generate enough renewable electricity to meet the annual domestic consumption needs of an estimated 37,000 homes.

A community fund would benefit the local area to the tune of around £375,000 a year – or £9 million over the lifespan of the turbines.

The developer believes it would deliver important benefits to the community, with part of the fund targeted to tackle fuel poverty.

In addition, the firm has said that it will explore the opportunity for local investment in the windfarm from community organisations and individuals.

While it will hope such offers may sway opinion, campaign groups are likely to keep lobbying to block the development.

Residents have complained of being “under siege” by green energy developers.

Source:  By Mark Mackay | The Courier | November 1, 2014 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon