LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Scottish Government Reporter rejects wind farm scheme on widely applicable grounds 

Credit:  Posted on August 29, 2014 by newsroom | For Argyll | forargyll.com ~~

Michael Cunliffe, a Scottish Government Reporter at the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals, a few days ago rejected plans for the eight-turbine Barrel Law wind farm in the Scottish Borders.

The Reporter ruled that this development was surplus to requirements because the Scottish Government has already almost hit its green energy targets.

He cited the Government target to generate about 16 gigawatts [GW] of energy from renewables by 2020. He then noted that against this overall target:

• 6.8GW is operational
• 6.5GW is under construction or consented
• 7-2GW proposals are currently in planning.

Jack Ponton, vice-chairman of the Borders Network of Conservation Groups noted that: ‘This is the first time that a reporter has so explicitly referred to the pending attainment of targets.’

In rejecting the Barrel Law proposal, Michael Cunliffe also cited concerns that the proposed installation would interfere with military radar and detract from the natural beauty of the landscape around Hawick.

He did, however, also made it clear that the vast number of wind farms in the pipeline had influenced his decision.

He accepted that some wind farm proposals might be rejected or not be completed by 2020, but came to the conclusion that ‘the rate of progress and the availability of alternatives suggested that Barrel Law’s contribution would not be as great as it would have been with a larger shortfall against the target, or a lack of other schemes.

The Reporter’s stance is based on a rational principle that is welcome in what has become a highly politicised area of contest. Scottish ministers whose economic case for independence rests heavily on exporting vast amounts of energy to other parts of Brita, may not, however, be pleased.

The position Mr Cunliffe adopted and the judgment he laid down will now, rightly, become major instruments of argument by those opposed to even more wind farm development across Scotland, on and offshore.

A target is a target; and the entire wind sector development has been sold to the population on the basis of reaching that target – which is now demonstrably achieveable.

Source:  Posted on August 29, 2014 by newsroom | For Argyll | forargyll.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon