LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Not far enough 

Credit:  Times Argus | August 15, 2014 | www.timesargus.com ~~

In Mark Whitworth’s commentary on Tuesday titled “Wrong direction for net metering,” he presented analysis of a number of documented and researched problems with wind turbines and with net metering, but he did not take it far enough. Net metering is a program that buys electricity from non-utility owners of renewable power generation sources (solar, wind, etc.). The utility must buy this electricity at a premium price well above what it costs the utility to make the same amount of power. An owner can zero out his utility bill by selling back less than he uses. It would not take many of these types of contracts to reduce the thin profit margins of the utilities. The utility must then pass on its costs to the rest of the users or go out of business. That’s not a viable program for energy efficiency.

As Mark pointed out, historical data shows that wind turbines are a net loss to the taxpayers and to the utility. The only reason they are being promoted is that there is mandated net metering and a long list of subsidies that benefit the real, usually out-of-state, owners and investors of the turbines. Those subsidies are paid by Vermont taxpayers and by costs passed to the ratepayers of the utility.

When will our politicians stop making feel-good, green policies that are neither green nor cost-effective? When will verifiable and indisputable historical data from hundreds of worldwide wind turbine installations that shows they are not sustainable, green or cost-effective be used to guide policymaking? When will we accept that most renewable energy is not sustainable without large taxpayer-paid subsidies? Let’s get real.

Tom Watkins

Montpelier

Source:  Times Argus | August 15, 2014 | www.timesargus.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon