LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Federal agency names offshore NC wind areas 

Credit:  By Bruce Henderson | Charlotte Observer | Aug. 11, 2014 | www.charlotteobserver.com ~~

The Obama administration has identified more than 300,000 acres offshore of North Carolina for potential wind-energy development in a step toward issuing the first commercial leases there.

North Carolina has the nation’s highest offshore wind resources, according to a 2010 federal study.

Three areas, totaling 307,000 acres, were selected from a much larger 1.2 million acres for which the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management began soliciting developer interest and public comment in late 2012.

It’s uncertain when actual leases would be auctioned. Five companies have expressed interest in developing wind projects off North Carolina.

“This is obviously a significant step in the process, and we’re glad to see things proceeding,” said Brian O’Hara, president of the Southeastern Coastal Wind Coalition in Raleigh.

The federal agency has awarded five wind leases in the offshore Atlantic coast: off Massachusetts, Delaware, Rhode Island and Virginia. It will hold an auction next week for an area off Maryland and auctions off Massachusetts and New Jersey in the next year.

The three North Carolina areas selected include about 122,000 acres 24 miles off Kitty Hawk, on the Outer Banks. An area of 51,000 acres is 10 miles from Wilmington and an additional 133,000 acres is 15 miles off Bald Head Island near Southport, on the state’s southern tip.

The areas were chosen, the bureau said, because they protect sensitive habitats and views and don’t conflict with military operations, shipping and fishing.

The National Park Service successfully argued that the Kitty Hawk wind area not be within 34 miles of the historic Bodie Island Lighthouse, and the town of Kitty Hawk won a 20-mile minimum distance from the coast. Sensitive fish habitat and shipping lanes were deleted from the area off Bald Head Island.

O’Hara said he was dismayed to see large portions of the area near Kitty Hawk deleted.

“If you cut out every area that everyone says not to build something, you don’t have much left,” he said. “We do look forward to engaging with BOEM to add additional areas back in.”

The federal bureau will complete environmental assessments before leases are offered at auction. If leases are issued, commercial wind projects would have to file construction and operation plans and site-specific studies.

A bureau spokeswoman said the North Carolina environmental studies will probably be completed within a year. But the scrutiny the projects would receive make it hard to estimate when leases could be offered, she said.

Even after leases are sold, projects can’t move forward until developers also have agreements to sell their energy.

North Carolina’s input will be limited compared to the siting and leasing decisions made by the federal agency, said Bob Leker, renewable energy program manager in the N.C. Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources.

“Wind is certainly a part of the all-of-the-above strategy” touted by Gov. Pat McCrory, Leker said.

The five companies expressing interest in North Carolina’s offshore win include Dominion subsidiary Virginia Electric and Power. A second subsidiary, Dominion Virginia Power, won a $1.6 million bid last September to lease 112,800 acres off Virginia’s coast.

Source:  By Bruce Henderson | Charlotte Observer | Aug. 11, 2014 | www.charlotteobserver.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon