| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Developer of Tableland Wind Farm accused of issuing gag order to estate residents
Credit: Locals hushed on wind farm | DANIEL BATEMAN | The Cairns Post | June 20, 2014 | www.cairnspost.com.au ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The property developer behind a proposed Tableland wind farm has banned residents living at a nearby rural estate from speaking out about the controversial project.
Developer Port Bajool Pty Ltd has placed a clause in its contracts for sale for properties at Oaky Creek Farms, stating there be no objection to the proposed $380 million Mt Emerald Wind Farm.
The State Government has called in the application for the development from the Mareeba Shire Council and is expected to decide if it will proceed by the end of the year.
Port Bajool and Ratch Australia are hoping to start construction on the project, near Mareeba, in early 2015.
The proposal, a joint venture between Port Bajool and energy company Ratch Australia, includes up to 75 turbines to potentially generate enough electricity to power 75,000 homes each year.
A survey of residents living within a 5km radius of the proposed development site, however, showed about 90 per cent objected, mainly out of concern about noise pollution.
Port Bajool’s contract states the vendor had disclosed certain feasibility studies and that a development application would be made for the construction of wind turbines on a nearby property.
It then states “the purchaser must not object to any application or procedure made or initiated by or on behalf of the vendor or a third party in respect of any use or development of Lot 7 SP235244”.
“The purchaser acknowledges that the purchaser will not be materially prejudiced by the development or use of Lot 7 SP235244 as a ‘wind farm’ for the generation of electrical power,’’ it reads.
Port Bajool director John Morris said despite the wind farm being “a very newsworthy subject” across the Tablelands, the clause merely ensured buyers were fully aware of the proposed wind farm prior to purchasing property.
“It’s not a gag order, because before they sign the contract, they’re saying they won’t object to it,’’ he said.
An Oaky Creek resident, who did not want to be named, said when they purchased the property several years ago, the seller understated the size of the proposed wind farm.
They said they regretted signing the contract without carrying out in-depth research on the development, which they now strongly opposed out of concern about the noise.
“Reading the gag clause, you think they’re obviously not serious and it’s just a proposal, it’s probably never going to happen,’’ the resident said.
“When you did talk to the people selling the property, they say it’s nothing really and it’s probably not going to go ahead.”
Dalrymple MP Shane Knuth, who has been critical of the project since it was announced about four years ago, said the clause was evidence the developers would do anything to ensure the project went ahead.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=64670 ]
| Tag: Complaints |
