LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Let wind complete without favors 

Credit:  The Wall Street Journal | May 30, 2014 | wsj.com ~~

Michael Goggin of the American Wind Energy Association makes the assertion that wind electricity (and other low-fuel-cost sources) are inherently cheaper than those consuming expendable fuels, but he offers no supporting facts (Letters, May 27). He blames temporary lack of transmission lines and existence of “inflexible” nuclear plant competition for wind’s occasional local premiums.

Mr. Goggin’s unsubstantiated assertions ignore the massive energy cost jump Germany experienced after its major move to wind and solar, causing home heating cost spikes and driving major industries to relocate plants to lower-energy-cost countries, leading to the present hasty construction of 10 coal plants to ameliorate this now-discredited blunder.

James W. Benefiel

Dunedin, Fla.

Michael Goggin’s argument on behalf of the wind lobby that wind energy “is saving consumers money by displacing more expensive forms of energy” doesn’t hold water. If it were really saving consumers money, wind energy would need neither federal or state tax credits nor renewable-energy mandates to spur its adoption. Utilities and their customers would embrace it for no better reason than its being in their own self-interest to do so.

His statement that tax relief for his industry “more than pays for itself by enabling economic development that generates additional tax revenue” is the cry rent seekers have used for ages. I have an offer for him: If he’ll forgo the tax relief, I’ll gladly do without that supposed additional tax revenue.

Andrew Terhune

Philadelphia

Source:  The Wall Street Journal | May 30, 2014 | wsj.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky