LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Dentist faces charges for refusing patients who support windfarm 

A Manitoulin Island dentist is facing four allegations of disgraceful, dishonourable or unethical conduct.

The Royal College of Dental Surgeons recently laid the charges against Dr. Bill Studzienny of Gore Bay. The registrar for the College says three of the allegations are based on complaints from Studzienny’s patients.

Registrar Irwin Fefergrad said he initiated the fourth.

In an interview last September with CBC News, Studzienny said he refused treatment to certain councillors on M’Chigeeng and Little Current councils because he is opposed to wind turbines and was unhappy with councillors who voted in favour of them on McLean’s Mountain.

He said the aboriginal and municipal politicians made “foolish decisions for their own gain”.

M’Chigeeng Chief Joe Hare said his band chose turbines for environmental reasons – and thinks the dentist went too far.

“We found his conduct and his opinion and what he did to be reprehensible,” he said. “We just couldn’t understand why he would go to that length to make a point.”

Studzienny didn’t return recent calls from CBC News.

Fefergrad said no date has been set for the disciplinary hearing. The penalty could range from a fine to the loss of the dentist’s licence.

“If patients were abandoned in reference to his beliefs, we believe this to be discriminatory,” Fefergrad added.

Hare said the issue has divided the community.

“Some people agreed with him and we didn’t realize there was so much bias against what we are attempting to do,” he said. “We’re trying to take care of ourselves here in this community.”

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky