| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Council rejects Peters Marland wind turbine
Credit: Andy Keeble | North Devon Gazette | Tuesday, May 6, 2014 | www.northdevongazette.co.uk ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Wind farm opponents have hailed a decision to refuse planning permission for a wind turbine at Peters Marland, near Torrington.
Torridge District Council rejected plans for the single 77-metre-high 500kW turbine due to its scale, location and cumulative impact on the landscape.
The council also raised concern about potential harm to local heritage sites, including the Grade II listed Peters Marland Parish Church.
It was felt that the proposals by applicant Murex Energy for land at Eastwood Farm would have had a dominant impact on views from the village.
It is unclear whether the decision will be appealed by the applicant.
A report by Kate Little, the council’s head of strategic development and planning, said: “The height and proximity would have unacceptable and overbearing impact on neighbouring properties.
“Insufficient information is provided about predicted noise levels, background noise levels and shadow flicker.”
Peters Marland and Shebbear parish councils had already objected to the proposals, fearing the area would become a ‘wind turbine landscape’.
A parish council poll, which accounted for 80 per cent of adult parishioners, found 74 per cent (93) against and 10 per cent (13) in favour of the turbine. Of those asked, 15 per cent (19) were undecided.
Consent has already been granted for six similar sized turbines on various sites at nearby Shebbear and Stibbs Cross.
Planning permission is being sought for a further 77-metre-high turbine at Shebbear, while a 34-metre-high turbine at Frithlestock is already in operation.
Penny Mills, chairman of the Torridge branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), said: “There was overwhelming opposition to it from the local community, it would have been situated far too close to people’s homes and the noise and visual impact would have been completely unacceptable.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=63654 ]
| Tag: Victories |
