LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Kansas House rejects repeal of renewable energy standards 

Credit:  By Bryan Lowry, Eagle Topeka bureau | The Wichita Eagle | May 2, 2014 | www.kansas.com ~~

A bill designed to repeal renewable energy standards in Kansas failed to advance Friday after a tight House vote.

House members voted 63-60 against advancing a bill that would gradually end the state’s renewable portfolio standard, which requires the state’s utility companies to get 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2020.

Its two main proponents, Rep. Dennis Hedke, R-Wichita, and Sen. Forrest Knox, R-Altoona, said the issue was effectively dead for the session.

An outright repeal of the energy standards failed to pass the House earlier in the session.

A compromise crafted Thursday would have allowed the state’s current 10 percent requirement to increase to 15 percent in 2016 and then cease to exist in 2021.

House Speaker Ray Merrick, R-Stilwell, called the proposal a “wonderful compromise” a few minutes before the House vote.

Proponents of ending renewable energy standards say the cost of clean energy will spike now that a federal subsidy for wind production has ended, and that will drive up electric bills.

Supporters of clean energy have repeatedly pointed to data from the Kansas Corporation Commission, which concluded renewable energy was responsible for less than 2 percent of rate increases.

Conservative activist group Americans for Prosperity, whose members filled the Capitol on Thursday, strongly pushed for the repeal.

“It doesn’t solve all the problems with the high electricity rates. The EPA has done its share of the damage, but this is something that the state can do,” Jeff Glendening, AFP’s Kansas director, said before the vote. “It’s a great business decision for the state. It’s a great decision for the ratepayers of Kansas.”

But Kimberly Svaty, policy director for the Wind Coalition, said wind production has brought $8 billion of new investment to the state and 13,000 new jobs. She said the standard contributed to that growth.

“I think the RPS has been a really good policy for the state of Kansas. And for three years we’ve been having this conversation. And for three years either the House or the Senate or both have voted down a policy to alter the RPS,” Svaty said. “It doesn’t cost the state any money, and it has created a lot of jobs and new investment.”

Hedke, chairman of the House Energy and Environment Committee, has been one of the strongest proponents of repeal. He said that it was a debate the House needed to have on Friday.

But several House members from both parties pushed back against what they saw as an effort to speed through a controversial policy at the end of the session.

Rep. Scott Schwab, R-Olathe, said the House had not had sufficient hearings on the issue to justify ending the standard and that it could be taken up next year.

Rep. Annie Kuether, D-Topeka, ranking minority member on the energy committee, was more emphatic about this point.

“It’s the final hour. We have important things to talk about, and we should not be wasting time on something that clearly the House has had a position on,” she said, referring to the chamber’s previous votes against repeal.

She said the bill has created jobs. “It sends a message to everybody worldwide that we’re open for business. Why do we want to shut that down?”

How they voted

Here’s how south-central Kansas lawmakers voted on a proposal to gradually end renewable energy standards. It was rejected 63-60.

Republicans voting yes: Steve Anthimides, Steve Brunk, Mario Goico, Daniel Hawkins, Dennis Hedke, Mark Hutton, Mark Kahrs, Les Osterman, Gene Suellentrop, Wichita; Will Carpenter, El Dorado; David Crum, Augusta; Pete DeGraaf, Mulvane; George “Joe” Edwards, Haysville; Kyle Hoffman, Coldwater; Jim Howell, Derby; Steve Huebert, Valley Center; Kasha Kelley, Arkansas City; Les Mason, McPherson; Virgil Peck, Tyro; Marc Rhoades, Newton; Jack Thimesch, Cunningham

Republicans voting no: Steven Becker, Buhler; Don Schroeder, Hesston; Joe Seiwert, Pretty Prairie

Democrats voting no: Carolyn Bridges, John Carmichael, Gail Finney, Roderick Houston, Tom Sawyer, Pat Sloop, Ponka-We Victors, Jim Ward, Brandon Whipple, Wichita; Jan Pauls, Hutchinson; Ed Trimmer, Winfield

Source:  By Bryan Lowry, Eagle Topeka bureau | The Wichita Eagle | May 2, 2014 | www.kansas.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon