LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Latest Groton wind farm fight: Snow plowing 

Credit:  By DAN SEUFERT, Union Leader Correspondent | April 22, 2014 | www.unionleader.com ~~

GROTON – The Attorney General and local residents are protesting an attempt by Groton Wind, LLC to avoid having to plow the roads leading to its 24 ridge-line wind turbines during winter months.

And Senior Assistant Attorney General Peter Roth said Monday he wants the company to move its warehouse-sized operations and maintenance building at the top of Groton Hollow Road across the road from where it sits, despite the contention by Groton Wind and its parent company, Iberdrola Renewables of Spain, that the company could not build on that site.

The company said when it built the wind farm three years ago, it changed the location of the “O&M” building to avoid problems it found on the planned site. The company said it cleared the change in plans with the state’s Department of Environmental Services.
But Roth says the company needed to tell all the necessary state agencies about the change in plans, not just DES.

“They need to move the building to where it was supposed to be, it’s a violation of their operating certificate if they don’t,” Roth said.
The SEC has threatened to pull the plant’s operation license because of a long list of violations found by state inspectors. Many of the issues have apparently been solved by an agreement announced last week between the state Fire Marshal and Groton Wind, though the agreement has yet to be approved by the SEC.
Issues still remain, Roth said, that must be addressed, such as the location of the operations building and access and maintenance to the turbine roads.

The certificate and operating agreement with the town required Groton Wind to construct and maintain roads at its facility “that allow for year-round access to each wind turbine at a level that permits passage and turnaround of emergency response vehicles.”
But in a motion filed last week with the state’s Site Evaluation Committee, Groton Wind and Iberdrola Renewables officials said they would rather have access to the towers in the winter via snow machine.

A study done by Iberdrola Revewables found that “plowing on steep grade roads creates a safety concern, increases concentration of spring melt runoff and would be extremely costly.” Iberdrola also states that “turbine access during the winter months will be provided by a snow cat or similar vehicle.”
Iberdrola’s plan “presents the safest and most environmentally sound way to maintain the turbine roads,” the company said in its filing.

Mark Watson, who lives 1½ miles from the east turbines, is an “intervenor” in the SEC’s ongoing investigation into complaints at the plant. He says the company is trying to save money by not plowing. In a letter to the SEC, Watson said he was “disappointed Iberdrola would place financial concern before the safety of residents of surrounding communities.”

The neighboring town of Rumney has also expressed concern to the town and the state about not being able to access the towers in winter if an emergency occurs.

“The company hasn’t yet presented an emergency response plan, as they required to,” Roth said, who is representing the public in this case.

“The certificate established that the roads should be open and accessible at all times,” he said. “The company needs to stick to its certificate.”

Groton Wind and Iberdrola officials did not return inquiries asking for comment Monday.

Source:  By DAN SEUFERT, Union Leader Correspondent | April 22, 2014 | www.unionleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky