LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Tax-break revival said to get U.S. Senate committee vote 

Credit:  By Richard Rubin | Bloomberg | 2014-03-19 | www.bloomberg.com ~~

The U.S. Senate Finance Committee probably will vote during the week of March 31 to revive dozens of tax breaks that expired Dec. 31, said a Democratic aide to the panel.

The breaks include the research and development credit and a provision that lets companies including Citigroup Inc. and General Electric Co. defer U.S. taxes on some of their foreign income.

Other expired breaks include the production tax credit for wind energy and a tax credit for manufacturers of energy-efficient appliances such as Whirlpool Corp.

The tax-break vote will be the first test for Senator Ron Wyden, the Oregon Democrat who became the Finance Committee’s chairman last month.

The panel hasn’t decided whether to extend the breaks through the end of 2014 or 2015, said the aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity when discussing the committee’s yet-to-be-announced plans. Wyden’s proposal probably will exclude or refine some of the 55 breaks, the aide said, with a goal to produce a bipartisan bill.

No decisions have been made on the content of the measure or the timing for a committee session and vote, said Julia Lawless, a spokeswoman for Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, the panel’s top Republican.
Cutting ‘Fat’

“When it comes to tax extenders, Senator Hatch believes there’s a lot of fat that needs to be cut and that Congress should not continue to deal with them in a business-as-usual manner,” Lawless said in an e-mailed statement. “A committee markup would provide an opportunity to expose these provisions to scrutiny and sunlight.”

Hatch has called for individual scrutiny of the expired measures. “I’m going to insist that we cut back rather than just keep all of them,” he told reporters in early January. “We should do only the ones that we really should do.”

Wyden has made reviving the lapsed breaks his first goal since taking over for Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat who is now the U.S. ambassador to China.

The path forward after a committee vote or Senate passage isn’t clear.

House Republicans have said they won’t consider a short-term extension of the breaks. In that chamber, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican, on Feb. 26 released a draft revamp of the entire U.S. tax code.
Research, Development

“I am not going to sacrifice important matters like research and development and innovation on the altar of perhaps some inaction on comprehensive reform,” Wyden said Feb. 13 on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt.”

A one-year extension would cost the government $46 billion or $47 billion in revenue, the aide said.

Many of the provisions have broad bipartisan support. Others, including the wind credit and accelerated depreciation for motorsports tracks, divide U.S. lawmakers.

Some tax breaks have influential backers either on the committee or in the Senate.

For example, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell has supported a lapsed provision that shortens the depreciation period for race horses, an issue that’s important to the horse industry in his home state of Kentucky.

Senator Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, has focused on a lapsed provision that allows mass-transit commuters to receive as much as $250 in tax-free benefits a month, up from the current $130.

Source:  By Richard Rubin | Bloomberg | 2014-03-19 | www.bloomberg.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky