| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Senator: Wind firm sent GPs ‘propaganda’
Credit: By SEAN McCOMISH | The Standard | March 20, 2014 | www.standard.net.au ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Victorian senator John Madigan has accused the operator of the Macarthur wind farm of corruption and has compared wind energy to the tobacco industry.
But the country’s leading medical group, the Australian Medical Association (AMA), says there is no evidence for the senator’s claims that turbines affect health.
Wind farm operator AGL has denied the senator’s claims, pointing to a trove of government and international research. Speaking in the senate this week, the outspoken Ballarat-based Democratic Labour Party senator said AGL Australia had pressured doctors in the south-west into ignoring all claims of wind turbine syndrome in the lead-up to the Macarthur wind farm going online.
“In November 2012 AGL wrote to doctors in 12 clinics across western Victoria about one of its power generation facilities at the Macarthur wind farm,” Senator Madigan said. “These medical practices span in an area of several hundred kilometres from Hamilton in the north to Portland and Warrnambool in the south.
“The letter’s aims were to discredit and discount any patient visiting any doctor with any claims of ill health brought out by living near the Macarthur wind farm.
“It is an outrageous and pre-emptive example of corporate propaganda and was directed straight into the consulting rooms of rural and regional doctors.” A copy of the letter, provided by AGL to The Standard, tells doctors that “no less than 17 independent international studies” rejected health impacts.
It suggests GPs could direct patients to AGL “if you feel it would be beneficial”.
“AGL goes above and beyond regulatory noise monitoring requirements. We have collected more than 40,000 hours of data and continue our monitoring program to ensure we remain compliant,” an AGL spokeswoman told The Standard yesterday.
Senator Madigan also quoted an “anonymous” health survey carried out in the area last year that found 60 people living within eight kilometres of the wind farm were experiencing “detrimental impacts” from its turbines. However, The Standard reported in September that the survey was commissioned by an anti-wind group, the Australian Industrial Wind Turbine Awareness Network, and undertaken by a person opposed to another wind farm near her own home.
A statement released by the AMA said: “There is no accepted physiological mechanism where sub-audible infrasound could cause health effects.”
“The reporting of ‘health scares’ and misinformation regarding wind farm developments may contribute to heightened anxiety and community division, and over-rigorous regulation of these developments by state governments.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=62417 ]
