LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turtle tussle continues over wind farm 

Credit:  By: John Spears Business reporter | Toronto Star | Published on Thu Mar 13 2014 | www.thestar.com ~~

A naturalists’ group will appeal a judgment that allows a wind farm to proceed in the habitat of an endangered turtle at Ostrander Point in Prince Edward County.

But the appeal could become a race against time, as the company developing the wind farm says it plans to start work on the project as soon as weather permits.

The Prince Edward County Field Naturalists are seeking leave to appeal a divisional court decision allowing Gilead Power to proceed with its wind farm.

Eric Gillespie, lawyer for the group, said he has filed a notice with Ontario Court of Appeal.

But a more immediate battle may loom, as Gilead Power says it plans to start work right away with construction of its nine-turbine project – an action the naturalists vow to fight.

“If we can do it, we will,” Gilead vice president Mike Lord said in an interview.

The question mark is the weather. The severe winter weather will hamper work for the moment, and activity on the site is also restricted between May 1 and Nov. 1 because of the area’s sensitive ecology.

As well as being home to Blanding’s turtle, the area is a bird and bat migration route, and has rare vegetation.

An environmental tribunal had originally halted the wind project, ruling that it would endanger Blanding’s turtle, a species listed as threatened.

But a divisional court panel struck down the tribunal’s ruling last month.

The court reinstated the project’s renewable energy approval, or REA.

“Because the REA has been reinstated, we are in a position to be able to move towards construction,” Lord said. “I don’t want to leave people with the impression that we’re not going to do anything out there.”

“We have advised Mr. Gillespie that we plan on moving forward with construction.”

The weather may slow things down, but Lord said the first task would be to remove some vegetation from the site. That would allow crews to clear the site of unexploded weaponry, as the area was once used as a military training range.

The company will have to build access roads – an especially contentious issue because the naturalists have argued that increased traffic by both vehicles and humans could threaten wildlife.

Gillespie said the idea that Gilead would start work before the appeal process has worked its way through the courts is “deeply disturbing to many people across Ontario.”

“It looks like our client is going to be put in the position of having to go to court to ask the court to maintain the status quo while the appeal process is moving forward,” he said.

Gillespie said he’s been given instructions to ask the court to halt any activity on the site until the appeal is decided. Gilead had previously held back from work on the site when the environmental tribunal was considering the project, he said.

The appeal itself will be based on several grounds. Gillespie said the court showed “very little deference” to the judgment of the environmental tribunal.

“They are there specifically because they have developed specialized expertise in this area,” Gillespie said.

The court also gave little weight to expert evidence given on how the project would affect turtles, he said.

Source:  By: John Spears Business reporter | Toronto Star | Published on Thu Mar 13 2014 | www.thestar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon