LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Councils slam appeal case for Shaw Park turbines 

Credit:  The Southern Reporter | 13 February 2014 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk ~~

A joint submission from two community councils has criticised the appellant’s case for approval of plans for a wind farm above Stow.

In a statement submitted to the Shaw Park appeal by Stow and Fountainhall and Heriot community councils, they state that Green Cat Renewables have failed to take into consideration three other proposed wind farms.

The community councils have also hit out at the suggestion that the wind farm would be ‘community owned’, claiming this is “a red herring and should play not part in the planning process”.

Community councillors have also called for the reporter to hold a hearing so concerns about the landscape and visual impact of the proposal can be outlined.

Their statement says that the appellant’s case has some ‘remarkable omissions’, citing the lack of consideration of the potential cumulative impact of the Long Park extension, Girthgate and Muircleugh wind farms.

It also states that the nine Shaw Park turbines would have an “overwhelming adverse effect on Stow, on Lauder Common and more widely”.

The submission concludes: “The community councils consider that the Shaw Park wind farm would have a totally unacceptable impact on local communities, residents and visitors.”

Lauderdale Preservation Group has also submitted a response, stating the landscape and visual impact is sufficient reason for refusal.

Source:  The Southern Reporter | 13 February 2014 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky