LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Proposed bill would extend scenic impact of wind projects 

Credit:  The Associated Press | January 13, 2014 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

Maine must strengthen its laws to ensure wind power development doesn’t hinder the beauty of its natural resources, supporters of a bill to amend the state’s wind energy laws said Monday.

Under a bill being considered by the Energy, Utility and Technology Committee, the state could seek an assessment of the visual impact of a wind project as far as 15 miles from a scenic resource, like the Appalachian Trail, instead of 8 miles as it’s written in current law.

But opponents, like the Sierra Club Maine, said such a requirement will unnecessary burdens on wind energy development, which they say has a significant economic impact on the state and is desperately needed to lessen the dependence on fossil fuels.

Several wind projects have been built across the state since the current law was signed in 2008, and during that time the weakness in the law has become evident, said Democratic Rep. Terry Hayes of Buckfield, the bill’s sponsor.

Changes must be made to ensure Maine strikes the right balance between advancing wind energy development and maintaining the state’s natural beauty, she said.

“If we’re not careful in achieving the right balance between wind power development and Maine’s scenic character, we will lose the very quality of place that makes Maine special,” she said. “So, as with all laws, we make adjustments as our experiences dictate.”

But Glen Brand, director of the Sierra Club Maine, said the measure creates “unworkable subjective standards for evaluating a wind project’s visual impact.” Together with a bill that would change the process for wind project proposals in the state’s unorganized territories, it would deter future wind energy investment in Maine, he said.

That will hamper an industry that has brought not only environmental benefits, but significant economic benefits to the state, said Jeremy Payne, executive director of the Maine Renewable Energy Association.

Since 2008, more than $1 billion in investment has been pumped into the state and created 240 jobs per year, much of which has benefited rural parts of the state where it is greatly needed, he said.

Source:  The Associated Press | January 13, 2014 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon