LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine bid near Duddo stone circle facing opposition 

Credit:  By Brian Daniel | The Journal | 1 Jan 2014 | www.thejournal.co.uk ~~

Plans to site wind turbines close to the North East’s answer to Stonehenge are facing opposition.

Proposals have been lodged for two engines near 4,000-year-old Duddo stone circle, a scheduled ancient monument near Berwick in Northumberland.

But a band of residents and Duddo Parish Council have objected to the plans.

Northumberland County Council is nevertheless recommending the application be approved at a meeting next week.

The application for engines with a tip height of 34.5m is for land north of Felkington Farm, at Norham, home of Cameron Martin.

It has been submitted by wind firm Fine Energy.

Seven residents and the parish council claim the proposal will have a significant adverse visual impact on the stones and that the turbines have not been sited so as to minimise any impact on the ancient monument.

The site is made up of five large blocks of stone, created in the Neolithic period next to the hamlet of Duddo. The reasons for its creation are shrouded in mystery.

A 19th Century dig revealed the base of two additional stones, which it is believed were removed in the mid 1800s.

The circle, also known as The Women or the Singing Stones, stands on a small knoll overlooking the Tweed basin.

A previous application for seven turbines at Toft Hill was refused because of the impact on the stones while plans for one engine at Shoreswood were thrown out for the same reason and are currently subject of an appeal.

The Felkington site is 1.8km from the stones and council papers acknowledge the turbines will be visible from the ancient monument.

Last night, objector Ian Corsie, of nearby Ancroft, said: “The reason the Toft Hill scheme was not approved was because of the proximity to the stones and that is another major issue for the Shoreswood one. So it is another key argument (in the Felkington case.)”

Objectors also say the proposal will have an adverse visual impact on the surrounding landscape, and an adverse impact on nearby residential properties in terms of visual impact and noise.

They argue the cumulative impact of the proposal has not been properly assessed and that it is for a commercial wind development which will not benefit the local economy or local residents.

A statement on the parish council’s website says: “The parish council has decided to object to this application on the grounds of its adverse cumulative impacts on the local landscape, the amenity of local residents and on the setting of the Duddo Stones.”

However, county council planning officers are recommending the planning and environment committee approve the scheme at a meeting on January 7.

Their report says: “The turbines would not be intrusive in views approaching the monument from the south (via the signed route) and would not interrupt the open views to the north (across the Tweed), north-west (Lammermuir Hills), west (Eildon Hills) and south-west (Cheviots) which inform an understanding of the setting and significance of the monument.

“The proposed development would therefore not cause ‘substantial harm’ to the setting and significance of Duddo Stone Circle.”

Fine Energy and Mr Martin were unavailable for comment yesterday.

4,000 year-old Duddo stone circle near Berwick

4,000 year-old Duddo stone circle near Berwick

Source:  By Brian Daniel | The Journal | 1 Jan 2014 | www.thejournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky