LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Controversial Nun Wood windfarm proposal is rejected 

Credit:  Conotroversial Nun Wood windfarm proposal is rejected | Bedford Today | 20 December 2013 | www.bedfordtoday.co.uk ~~

Villagers in Harrold received an early Christmas present when they heard that the proposal by energy giant RWE Npower to build a windfarm between their villages has been turned down.

An appeal by Npower was heard in June in front of a Planning Inspector who recommended that the windfarm should be turned down because “the adverse impacts of the scheme would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits”.

The ultimate decision was made by Eric Pickles, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, who accepted the Inspector’s recommendation.

Chairman of residents’ action group BLOT, which campaigned against the proposal, Brian Skittrall said “We are naturally pleased that we have won this important victory against a windfarm that would cause so much local harm.

“We are not celebrating yet because we do not know whether Npower will accept this decision and leave us in peace or whether they will come back with a third appeal or a third proposal.

“They have persecuted us for 8 years and we are sure that as long as they feel that there is a chance to get their hands on the obscene profits that windfarm operators can make, they are not going to give up.”

The proposal was to erect 12 wind turbines in two groups along the Three Shires Way as it runs between Bozeat, Lavendon and Harrold.

The windfarm would have been spread along 4.5km of the gap between the Milton Keynes windfarm at Petsoe Manor and the approved windfarm at Poddington, and it was the cumulative impact of the three windfarms

together that counted most heavily against Nun Wood.

Brian added: “BLOT would like to thank all those who have supported us over the years. We are particularly grateful to the councillors and Milton Keynes Council whose successful High Court challenge of the first planning appeal enabled us to have this second chance to get this harmful windfarm refused.

“All three local MPs, Alistair Burt, Mark Lancaster and Peter Bone, have also worked hard for us and Alistair Burt even came to the appeal in person and dramatically went head to head with Npower’s barrister.

“We also had excellent support from Councillor Field-Foster and Bedford Borough Council.

“We also need to thank the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) and the British Horse Society who have supported us throughout and gave evidence for BLOT at both appeals.

“We are only disappointed that the Borough Council of Wellingborough did not support us.

“We hope that Npower will now do the honourable thing and announce that they are no longer pursuing the Nun Wood site so that we can put the 8 years of stress and worry behind us and get on with our lives.”

Source:  Conotroversial Nun Wood windfarm proposal is rejected | Bedford Today | 20 December 2013 | www.bedfordtoday.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon