LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm poses no threat to bighorn sheep 

Credit:  By JEFF D. GORMAN | Courthouse News Service | December 12, 2013 | www.courthousenews.com ~~

A California wind-energy project will not threaten an endangered species of sheep, a federal appeals court ruled.
The Protect Our Communities Foundation, Donna Tisdale and Backcountry Against Dumps challenged the U.S. Department of Interior’s decision to allow Ocotillo Express to build 112 wind-turbine generations on 10,151 acres of public land in the Sonoran Desert in Imperial County, Calif.
In addition to the Interior Department, the plaintiffs named the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and three of its officers as defendants.
The foundation argued that the government’s approval of the wind project violated the Endangered Species Act by jeopardizing the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. The Interior Department issued a Biological Opinion that the 955 sheep would not be jeopardized by the project. The sheep have been plagued by disease, parasites and predators, and their numbers were as low as 276 in 1996.
In an opinion written by District Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel, the Southern District of California ruled that the biological opinion correctly concluded that even if the sheep lost up to 5,000 acres of their habitat, they would still be able to connect and reproduce.
In addition, Curiel wrote that the government properly considered the fact that the sheep can be poor dispersers.
“Federal defendants argue that the sheep tend to be poor dispersers but only outside of their home ranges. Within their home range, the PBS are more likely to avoid the project and move to another part of their home range,” he wrote.
Also, Curiel stated that the government properly considered the effect of noise and visual disturbance for the sheep, citing their tolerance of noise on Interstate 8.
“Vision is the primary sense the PBS use to detect predators,” he wrote. “Therefore, the wind turbines would be perceived as a threat and would lead to habitat avoidance.”

Source:  By JEFF D. GORMAN | Courthouse News Service | December 12, 2013 | www.courthousenews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky