| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
State House: Wind energy bills discussed
Credit: Story by WATD’s State House reporter Carol Kozma | December 4, 2013 | 959watd.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Wind energy bills were the focus of a Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy hearing at the State House Tuesday.
Representative David Vieira of East Falmouth received solid support for his Wind Energy Relief Act, a bill that sets similar conditions for wind energy developers that the town of Falmouth now requires.
When private companies build turbines in Falmouth Vieira said, they must set up a fund, that the town can use if problems develop with the project. For example, if the turbine has to be decommissioned or moved to a different location, the town can dip into the fund to handle expenses it may incur.
The proposed bill would require the state to set up two funds, a decommissioning and relocation fund and a relief fund, that cities and towns could use should problems crop up, if the state invested in research, or financially, to help set up a wind turbine.
Vieira spoke outside the hearing room after he testified.
“We should require of the Commonwealth that which we require of the private developer, some funds and escrow in case something goes wrong,” said Vieira.
The money for the two funds created by the bill would be transferred from the Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust Fund, a public benefits fund for renewable energy. The Department of Public Utilities and the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center would then choose the best ways to distribute the funds to cities and towns. Vieira proposed 15 million dollars in the relief fund, and 7.5 million dollars in decommission and relocation fund.
Because turbines in Falmouth cannot run on Sundays, Christmas, New Years, and Thanksgiving, and can only run 12 hours a day, Vieira said the town is not yet able to make a profit from the turbines. He said theoretically, the town could apply for relief until it found a more efficient way to run the turbines.
If the bill were to pass, citizens could also apply to the relief fund. Vieira said the sound from turbines cause a personal loss to citizens.
“From constituents talking to me it’s the use and enjoyment of their property that includes sleeping at night, enjoying gardening, being out in the yard during the day, all that,” said Vieira.
Many people who testified at the hearing complained of headaches, and sleepless nights caused by turbines.
Eleanor Tillinghast of Green Berkshire, an environmental group in Western Massachusetts testified in favor of the bill, because it would allow cities and towns to decommission or relocate turbines.
“If you never can sleep or if your children’s sleep is interrupted and they are not doing well in school, you get headaches, you get palpitation of your hearts because the noise of wind turbine is very different from other noise,” said Tillinghast.
She suggested that wind turbines should be located at least one mile and a quarter away from residential zones.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=59415 ]
