LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Appeal made against wind farm refusal 

Credit:  Eastbourne Herald | 04 December 2013 | www.eastbourneherald.co.uk ~~

An action group has said it is disappointed after learning of an appeal against the decision to reject plans for a wind farm in Polegate.

The proposals for Shepham Wind Farm were turned down by Wealden District Council back in May. Since then Galliford Try Renewables (GTR) has appealed against the decision.

Stop Shepham Wind Farm (SSWF) which comprises residents living in Hankham, Polegate and Stone Cross – says it is ‘extremely disappointed’ with the ‘insensitive move’ by GTR.

It added, “It was quite clear that the local community overwhelmingly rejected the original and subsequent proposals and that the local democratic process endorsed this opposition.

“The action group will again represent local concerns to this latest appeal process.”

The three turbines were recommended for approval by planning officers but the planning committee voted against the proposal when it was discussed on May 8.

They refused the application after hearing from concerned local residents who said the turbines, which would have been taller than Big Ben, would have a detrimental impact on their lives.

Yes to Shepham Wind Farm spoke at the meeting about the need for renewable energy.

A motion to refuse the plan was carried with seven votes to four.

The turbines were refused on the grounds that they would be dominant and intrusive on the landscape.

A new application submitted for the three turbines was submitted by GTR after it withdrew its application for five turbines. The revised plan for three turbines saw the height of them reduced slightly.

After those plans were refused GTR said it was ‘extremely disappointed’ with the ‘committee’s decision and that it had worked very closely with the council, statutory consultees and industry experts to produce an acceptable planning application.

Source:  Eastbourne Herald | 04 December 2013 | www.eastbourneherald.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon