LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

So much for sound testing 

Credit:  Sun Journal | November 29, 2013 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

I attended a state Board of Environmental Protection meeting concerning the permit for Saddleback Ridge Wind on Nov. 7.

The developer’s lawyer said over and over again that the data shows no wind project “out of compliance” in Maine. Why? Applicants must set up a toll free complaint hotline, then the DEP determines if complaints to the hotline are valid, which could take months, or years.

It has been suggested, worldwide, that local boards of health handle these hotlines.

In its March 2013 ruling on the Friends of Maine’s Mountains and Friends of Saddleback Mountain’s claim that the BEP abused its discretion when determining which nighttime sound level limit should apply to the Saddleback Ridge Wind application, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court noted that “It is unclear from the record how the Department and Board intend to enforce sound level limits for wind projects.”

At the Nov. 7 meeting, a BEP member asked why the third party sound specialist was not present. The board member expressed that he had a question and a lot of money was spent on this specialist, asking “where is he?”

The law on testing sound was cited, and twice I heard testing was done “downwind from noise source, between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m.”

No one on the BEP board asked if the monitors were downwind. So much for testing data.

Were all the tests taken that are required?

DEP has stated that Mars Hill, Vinalhaven and Beaver Ridge are all “so sorry” projects. Noise rulings did not apply.

Alice McKay Barnett, Carthage

Source:  Sun Journal | November 29, 2013 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon