LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

U.S. wind farms killed 600K bats last year — study 

Credit:  By Sam Pearson, E&E reporter • Posted: Monday, November 11, 2013 via www.governorswindenergycoalition.org ~~

More than 600,000 bats may have been killed by wind turbines last year in the continental United States, according to a new study, illustrating the ongoing controversy over clean energy projects’ environmental impacts.

The study by University of Colorado, Denver, researcher Mark Hayes, to be published in the journal BioScience, used statistical models to determine the estimate from other researchers’ peer-reviewed data of bat deaths at 21 wind energy facilities across the United States.

Almost all wind energy facilities have reported bat deaths, the study said, with bats most often falling victim to trauma from wind turbine blades and air pressure changes caused by the fast-moving machinery. Hayes said the actual number of bat deaths could be as much as 50 percent higher because his study did not include states with some of the highest bat populations and used a conservative statistical model.

Estimating environmental impacts on bats is particularly challenging because of their small size and nocturnal behavior. As a result, few data exist on the size of their populations in the United States, the study said

Bats face unique challenges from wind turbines because their low fertility rate makes it difficult for the population to regrow. Most bats give birth to one baby per year, and also face threats from climate change and disease, Hayes said. Some researchers have suggested acoustic sound may prompt bats to avoid wind turbines, or if more research is done to predict under what conditions bats are most likely to be active, wind turbines could be switched off at that time, Hayes said.

Hayes’ estimate of bat deaths is higher than some previous estimates, although lower than research published earlier this year in the journal Wildlife Society Bulletin, which used previously unpublished data to estimate 888,000 annual bat fatalities. Hayes also found different areas had varying rates of bat deaths, with the Appalachian region seeing the highest rates.

Some industry officials have sought to downplay those figures, pointing to research backed by the wind energy industry like a March study that found the “ability to assess risk of a proposed [wind energy] site remains tenuous.”

“The wind industry has taken the issue of wildlife impacts, especially bats, very seriously,” said Frank Maisano of Bracewell & Giuliani, which represents wind industry clients.

In a statement, John Anderson, the director for siting policy at the American Wind Energy Association, said the industry was already taking steps to adopt tougher Fish and Wildlife Service regulations and to protect bat habitats by working with state and federal regulators.

Anderson noted that greenhouse gas emissions – not wind energy – posed a far greater threat to bat species.

“Adding wind power, as the most readily scalable form of clean energy, reduces those emissions more rapidly than any other energy option,” Anderson said.

Hayes said he didn’t mean the paper as an attack on wind energy, which he sees as viable.

“What I hope people take away from it is that there may be some fairly significant negative repercussions for some wildlife species,” Hayes said, though he thought the bat problem could be solved with further research and new technology.

Source:  By Sam Pearson, E&E reporter • Posted: Monday, November 11, 2013 via www.governorswindenergycoalition.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon