LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbulence over turbine plan 

Credit:  By ROSEMARY BOLGER | The Examiner | Nov. 1, 2013 | www.examiner.com.au ~~

A case against Hydro Tasmania’s plans to build a $2 billion wind farm on King Island could test the “social licence to operate” concept for the first time in an Australia court.

The No TasWind Farm Group, which is attempting to block the state-owned company proceeding with its 200-turbine development, appeared in the Federal Court in Hobart yesterday.

In a statement issued on behalf of the group, its lawyers said the case was not about the merits of wind farms.

“It is about whether a large and powerful corporation can impose a vast industrial project on a small island community by claiming that it has a `social licence’ . . . when it can point to support from no more than a third of the community.”

Hydro Tasmania has denied the allegations.

However, the group suffered a legal setback yesterday, with Justice Duncan Kerr ordering it to narrow the scope of its statement of claim to avoid racking up unnecessary legal costs on both sides.

He described the original documents as “sprawling and inarticulate”.

The anti-wind farm group claims the results of a June poll which found just under 59 per cent of respondents supported the project falls short of the 60 per cent goal previously set by the company, partly because a third of eligible residents did not vote.

Hydro Tasmania is attempting to have the matter struck out.

“The claim that Hydro Tasmania set a threshold of 60 per cent community support as a prerequisite for beginning a feasibility study is incorrect,” a Hydro spokeswoman said in a statement following the hearing.

Hydro Tasmania is also seeking security of costs from the group.

Barrister Andrew Wood, representing the King Island group, admitted his client lacked the resources to meet the anticipated legal costs of the proceedings.

A Hydro spokeswoman said a decision on the TasWind project would only be made after the feasibility study is completed, which is expected to take about 18 months.

The parties will appear next in court on November 22.

Source:  By ROSEMARY BOLGER | The Examiner | Nov. 1, 2013 | www.examiner.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon