LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Opponents of Oakfield wind farm file lawsuit in federal court, worried about eagles and salmon 

Credit:  By Judy Harrison, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Posted Oct. 29, 2013 | bangordailynews.com ~~

Groups and individuals opposed to the construction of a wind farm in Oakfield have filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court to stop the proposed installation of 50 mountaintop turbines and 59 miles of transmission lines.

Protect Our Lakes and the Forest Ecology Network, both nonprofit groups, and people who own camps in the area sued the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Department of the Interior on Tuesday.

First Wind of Massachusetts is the developer of the $360 million project that will consist of 50 3.0-megawatt turbines that have the capacity to produce enough renewable energy to power more than 48,000 homes, according to the company. The new transmission lines will connect the turbines to the utility grid at the Penobscot County town of Chester.

The lawsuit claims the wind project, which was approved by Maine’s Department of Environmental Protection, would endanger bald eagles and Atlantic salmon. It also alleges the proposed project violates the International Migratory Bird Treaty, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.

The Army Corps of Engineers, which approved the project, “failed to do adequate investigation into probable impacts on bald eagles and Atlantic salmon if the project were to be built,” the complaint said. “The corps did not request that U.S. Fish and Wildlife service produce a biological assessment of either the Atlantic salmon or the bald eagle, merely concurring with the USFWS requirement that [the developer] develop an Eagle Conservation Plan and implement it prior to commercial operations. By that time, the habitat fragmentation and destruction will have occurred.”

John Lamontagne, spokesman for First Wind, said Tuesday that the firm had not yet received a copy of the complaint.

“During the permitting process for the project, the Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service carefully and thoroughly reviewed the project and its potential impacts and concluded that it complied with applicable federal laws,” Lamontagne said in a statement emailed to the Bangor Daily News. “We believe this project will be able to deliver significant economic benefits to the region and the town of Oakfield while generating clean renewable energy that will power thousands of homes.”

Residents of Oakfield voted two years ago to enter into an agreement with First Wind that paved the way for the $360 million project, according to a previously published report. Company officials said after the vote that construction most likely would begin in the summer of 2012 with an estimated completion date of fall 2013.

Construction has not yet begun but last month First Wind announced it had signed long-term power-purchase agreements with four Massachusetts utilities to provide them with electricity generated by the wind farm in Oakfield and another under development in Somerset County.

First Wind operates five wind farms in Maine, including Mars Hill Wind in Aroostook County, Rollins Wind in Penobscot County, Bull Hill Wind in Hancock County and Stetson Wind I & II in Washington County, according to its website.

Source:  By Judy Harrison, BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | Posted Oct. 29, 2013 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon