LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Milton Keynes Council leader assures public new wind turbine document will not be challenged in court 

Credit:  Written by James Averill | 18/10/2013 | www.mkweb.co.uk ~~

The leader of Milton Keynes Council has assured the public it will not end up back in court – after adopting a new supplementary planning document concerning wind farms.

Councillor Andrew Geary and his cabinet colleagues approved the document, which ‘protects the public from unintended impacts’ of wind turbine developments.

In April, energy firm RWE Npower Renewables defeated the council in a High Court case over buffer zone separation distances. The SPD was quashed because it contradicted a Local Plan from 2005.

The new SPD takes on board advice from the British Society of Horses, who say that wind turbines should be a distance of at least four times their height away from bridleways and footpaths, as it could startle horses and prove dangerous for riders.

Cllr Geary told a packed public gallery: “This SPD is in accordance with the High Court ruling. It simply reiterates what we were told we could do. I doubt we will see this one challenged.”

But Labour has indicated it will call the decision in, and Cllr Mick Legg said: “We believe this is a flawed document, is politically motivated and will see us back in court.”

Alan Francis, of Milton Keynes Green Party, said: “This is another attempt to have a no wind turbine policy in Milton Keynes. There are bridleways with horses near the busy M1. Does that mean they should shut the M1?”

Source:  Written by James Averill | 18/10/2013 | www.mkweb.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky